The AK-47

Posted Sunday, January 22, 2012, at 9:47 AM
Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Thank you

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Sun, Jan 22, 2012, at 7:36 PM
  • *

    Me too

    -- Posted by jessiemiller on Sun, Jan 22, 2012, at 8:47 PM
  • Pat wishes he had one of those AK-47's

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, Jan 22, 2012, at 9:06 PM
  • *

    I write this in hopes it will skip Zooks radar due to disagreement with his outlooks; all fun intended.

    I completely respect the AK47 and its long history. The Soviet Union did a lot with little, and from it came some of the most simple and yet reliable items known to this day. I will be chief among those that claim simple is usually best. But I can no longer agree with our Vietnam vets (by no means Zook in particular) assessment of the Stoner design, in regards to today's advanced M16. Mostly because it's not the standard Stoner design any longer.

    Most would think that our standard Air Force Airman (please note that "Airman" is capitalized and always should be as a proper noun like Marine, Soldier, and Seaman/Sailor) doesn't deploy in a combat capacity. Though most of the time it is true, now-a-days it's less so. Currently some Airman deploy in support of combat operations called JET deployments and within those stipulations, will probably be directly involved in combat operations, regardless of their career field, whether it be aircraft maintenance or finance support. No more are the days where Security Forces (used to be called Security Police [LE & SP]) are the Air Force's front-line firing teams.

    During such a deployment, a JET Airman (as they're usually called) is armed with the M4 (current designation for the Colt AR15 or [military] M16, which agreeably used to be mass-produced by Mattel the toy company). The M4 is a far cry from the M16 of Vietnam which I will agree with every Vietnam Vet, was lackluster at best due to the environment--or any other environment for that matter 'at the time'. Today's M4 is built with slightly wider tolerances, allowing for action heat growth, which metal on metal contact commonly produces, and chrome covered surfaces where needed; the barrel and gas tube [in some models] most notably. Modern military issue ammunition is proudly made in the U.S.A. by one or two manufactures of which performance and quality standards are constantly measured by lot number by our beloved U.S.M.C. and United States Army. The 5.56mm or the .223(cal) bullet is a little anemic indeed, but alas no creature, beast or human, has ever been retired by the sonic crack of the projectile whizzing 'past' it's head--bullet placement and good rifle practices are everything. And that's the direction that modern military rifle classes have gone in. [I say with a smile], the only odd-balls out there are the U.S.M.C., who use an extended barrel version of the M4, of which I assume is intended to increase their riflemen's accuracy. This concept I understand as a Marine's primary function (usually) is a rifleman first, and they have no intention of letting the bad guy get close enough to check out the latest Wall Street Journal. In either case, it's virtually the same weapon/rifle and are used to engage targets mostly the same way--save a Marine may yell a hearty obscenity to the target while said target 'thinks' they're going to overrun said Marines' position. Bottom line: My M4 served me any my Soldier/Marine brethren well.

    So in short, the old M16 has come a long way and evolved into the M4 that has protected many U.S. service members. I believe the AK47 to be a great firearm but the M4 has risen to the occasion and is something for America to be proud of. Just as each countries service has evolved with change and conformed, at an enlisted level, their weapons engagement training, so did we. And because of that, have excelled our small arms lethality capabilities; however unfortunate any hostilities ever be.

    I completely understand that this does not make a complete rebuttal case for the Armalite/Stoner designed AR15 [M16] when compared to the AK47, but I find it somewhat discomforting when the entire story of its (M16) evolution hasn't been brought to bear, of which Zook and I know I hardly scratched the surface.

    Now Zook, if you wanna get on a bandwagon, lets all vote to get rid of that 9mm and go back to .45's. All joking intended, see if you can get a real military shooter to agree to keep that 9mm--it ain't happ'in. And if I had my way, we would [for sure] be going back to the M14. HAHA!

    R.I.P Maj Richard Winters and God Bless America.

    -- Posted by Darksc8p on Sat, Jan 28, 2012, at 9:25 PM
  • *

    NUTZ! I didn't escape the Zook dragnet!

    I have to admit with honesty, M4's get finicky in course sand environments (Iraq). In fine sand environments, it's a matter of dry or grease lubing--and then no issues. And really, it's all about environment. The AK is more 'all-around' and I respect that. There's also the issue of the recoil system...oh, never mind. Me and you are talking apples and apples. HAHA! Regardless, another great firearms post and spot on.

    -- Posted by Darksc8p on Sat, Jan 28, 2012, at 10:08 PM
  • This is an excellent post I seen thanks to share it. It is really what I wanted to see hope in future you will continue for sharing such a excellent post.

    california legal ak47

    -- Posted by Lucas101990 on Wed, May 18, 2022, at 12:56 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: