The Boogeyman You Never Believed In

Posted Sunday, July 17, 2011, at 9:42 AM
Comments
View 96 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Wrong Points !

    The "weakening of America" started with the "apology-tours"

    The "Weakening of America" Started with the "Drug War" in 1937 and anyone who believes otherwise NEEDS TO GO BACK TOO BED.

    (And just what IS it with all these "Czars"........isn't that sort of "Soviet-ish?")

    "Back to Bed you go",,, the Drug Czar

    I guess the United States must be / or will have a Major "WAKE UP' huh

    Major Departments of Government that need to be flushed,,,anything that has to do with the Drug War, IE the Drug Czar, DEA and I guess now the ATF, what ever the heck these people do or justify what they do, those Departments need to get FLUSHED

    Don't Folks think its kinda Strange when it comes to Problems within the United States the (they, you,) Never seem to want to talk about the Drug War or Change anything

    ????????????? go figure

    -- Posted by Freedom on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 10:25 AM
  • *

    the time will come

    -- Posted by shockwave on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 11:11 AM
  • And this list is about half of what they have tried to do to us. Very sad for the younger people coming up and wanting to prosper and be free of government intrusion.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 1:11 PM
  • Just give me some truth

    John Lennon

    -- Posted by Freedom on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 1:20 PM
  • Dead on my friend! I cannot even add to what you have said.

    Hope you and Donna are well. Hang in there Zook. Lock and load my friend.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 4:28 PM
  • Wow bazookaman, do you and MtnHomer spend your days listening to Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh? Maybe taking in a little light reading of right-wing newsletters and websites?

    This post is filled with the same type on inaccuracies, half-truths, lies and innuendo as your previous "Oh, by the way" blog and his post on "Obama's Czars"

    Nancy Pelosi doesn't have her "own" 757. She used the same C20B that the previous Speaker of the House used. Now, she uses whatever Air Force craft is available, just like any other congressman. http://www.factcheck.org/2008/12/nancy-pelosis-personal-jet/

    Th Copenhagen Summit was attended by 21 congressman. Pelosi, 14 democrats and 6 republicans. Some did take family members. They utilized two Air Force 737's and a Gulfstream Five. Was this a waste of taxpayer money? Sure, no more so than the hundreds of other "political junkets" that have been taken by other politicians, both democrat and republican.

    Mark Lloyd is the Associate General Counsel and Chief Diversity Officer in the FCC. The associate general counsel/chief diversity officer works from the General Counsel's Office to help ensure that the communications field is competitive and generates widespread opportunities. The Office of the General Counsel serves as the Commission's chief legal adviser and representative.

    In the FCC hierarchy, he's second, third tier at best. Hardly a person in a position to "find some kind of excuse to SHUTDOWN all communication networks that do NOT fall to their knees and toss "rose bouguets" at the "Annointed One's feet as he passes". He wrote a paper that Glenn Beck didn't like, so now he's being hounded.

    No one in the government ever advocated taking obese children away from their families. This was a commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Association, by Dr. David Ludwig and Lindsey Murtaugh. Not any government agency or official.

    "Not since the Civil War, has an administration interfered with one of its own states for defending its rights......even to the point of taking sides....and in this case, the side of the ENEMY."

    Really? I guess you've forgotten a little thing called the civil rights movement? President Eisenhower...Little Rock...ring a bell? How about Selma Alabama? I guess sending in the National Guard, and Army troops when the Governors were just "defending their rights" doens't amount to taking sides.

    There were no "constitutionalists" in 1776. The constitution wasn't written until 1787 and ratified in 1788.

    I don't care what your political slant is; Republican, Democrat, Tea Party, Green Party or "Send them all to the Moon" party. If you're going to print a diatribe against whatever party you don't like, at least do a few seconds of research and not just regurgitate what you hear on the radio or receive in your inbox.

    -- Posted by Amuzeme on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 6:01 PM
  • Well said! I would like more detailed information such as names, dates and places for Billy Bob and the lemonade stand claims.

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 7:04 PM
  • My side? I don't have a side. This whole notion that you have to identify with a specific political party or idealogy is not something i subscribe to. If you truly want to label and piegonhole me, you can use "Independant".

    I don't blindly subscribe to either sides idealogy. Each political party has ideas i like, and each have those that i don't.

    I'll concede your point on "constitutionalists". If that's your definition, then the date doesn't matter. We'll have to agree to disagree on Lloyd, and you're dead wrong on Selma and Little Rock.

    Both the FCC and Lloyd have repeatedly contended that they are NOT in favor of the fairness doctrine and have no intention of bringing it back. The criticism of Lloyd is that in 2007 he wrote a report critical of conservative talk radio.

    The Feds stepped in in Little Rock and Selma IN SPITE of the governors not to help them. In both Selma and Little Rock the governors were staunch segregationists.

    George wallace, governor of Alabama, whos famous quote "In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" actually stood in the doorway of several schools to stop their integration. He stood by during the Selma to Montgomery marches and did nothing.

    Orval Faubus, Governor of Arkansas at the time defied a unanimous decision by the Supreme Court and ordered the Arkansas National Guard to stop African American students from attending Little Rock Central High School. Eisenhower had to federalize the Arkansas National Guard and send in part of the 101st Airborne to protect the students. How did Faubus respond? He closed Little Rock high schools for a year.

    I don't have issue with your little rants, you're entitled and yes some of what you have to say is truthful. Your opinion is your own and you're free to express it.

    But when you mix in less than factual statements to bolster your arguments, you're actually no better than those politicians you rant against.

    -- Posted by Amuzeme on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 8:12 PM
  • As to the lemonade story, the police are obligated to enforce local ordinances, they are not allowed to cherry pick which to enforce. If there is an issue it is a local one and quite frankly none of our business.

    Billy Bob, were the feds responsible, or was this a beef with neighbors, HOA or local ordinances. If it wasn't the feds, then again it's none of our business.

    As to foreign flags, there are many foreign flags flown in this country and I don't have an issue with that as long as protocol is followed and they fly lower than the stars and stripes.

    To bring issues regarding small town politics to the table and present them as an overview of the United States is meaningless.

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Sun, Jul 17, 2011, at 8:31 PM
  • Nothing like cherry picking. Here is a link to the whole story. Read about halfway down and look at a certain picture, and then let's talk about pandering to a certain voter base. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1691161/posts

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Mon, Jul 18, 2011, at 6:13 AM
  • You implied in your blog that the flag incident was done with the consent of the government. It was in fact a take over of a government building by protesters, done while the local police stood by.

    I do not condone the action, but do believe in full disclosure of the facts.

    On a different note, where do you stand on the traitorous actions of Bush, Cheney et. al. in the case of outing a C.I.A. operative? I'm sorry, but the sacrificial lamb Scooter Libby hardly qualifies as any true punishment for treason!

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Mon, Jul 18, 2011, at 7:02 AM
  • MtnHomer, my issue is not with the czars, nor is it with the messenger. It is with the MESSAGE. The message was false and misleading. Filled with "Anti-gun" "Radical Homosexual" "Anti-business" "Black Radical" rhetoric.

    When you get past the rhetoric, and look at what is posted about these people, you'll see that the FACTS don't bear out the claims.

    This administration has enough legitimate problems and credibility issues to attack without resorting to using underhanded smear tactics full of false information. Doing so just undermines your credibility and weakens any legitimate gripe or argument you might present.

    Your post listing the czars and their "beliefs" (which for some reason i can no longer find the original post) was full of inaccuracies.

    These "czars" have been around since the Roosevelt administration and used by every successive president since then. The most recognized is the drug czar. But now all of a sudden because this administration uses them it's some kind of communist/socialist plot.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S...

    http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-se...

    I found the original list after doing about 30 seconds of web searching. Here are some of the more egregious falsehoods that it contained.

    Richard Holbrooke

    Afghanistan Czar

    Ultra liberal anti gun former Gov. of New Mexico. Pro Abortion and legal drug use. Dissolve the 2nd Amendment

    Holbrooke was NEVER Governor of New Mexico.

    Ed Montgomery

    Auto recovery Czar

    Black radical anti business activist. Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks. Univ of Maryland Business School Dean teaches US business has caused world poverty. ACORN board member. Communist DuBois Club member.

    Montgomery was NEVER never Univ of Maryland Business School Dean. He Was NEVER an ACORN board memeber, nor was he a member of the Dubois Club. This radical club was active in the mid to late 60's. Montgomery was born in 1955...you do the math.

    Lynn Rosenthal

    Domestic Violence Czar

    Director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. Vicious anti male feminist. Supported male castration. Imagine?

    There is absolutely NO evidence that she has ever supported male castration. I guess because she's against domestic violence she's gotta be anti male?

    Gil Kerlikowske

    Drug Czar

    devoted lobbyist for every restrictive gun law proposal, Former Chief of Police in Liberal Seattle. Believes no American should own a firearm. Supports legalization of all drugs

    Really? interesting since In a May 22, 2009 interview on KUOW radio, he said any drug 'legalization' would be "waving the white flag" and that "legalization is off the charts when it comes to discussion, from my viewpoint" and that "legalization vocabulary doesn't exist for me and it was made clear that it doesn't exist in President Obama's vocabulary."

    Joshua DuBois

    Faith Based Czar

    Political Black activist-Degree in Black Nationalism. Anti gun ownership lobbyist..

    There isn't a college/university in the country that awards a degree in "Black Nationalism" There are classes in the subject but no such degree.

    Nancy-Ann DeParle.

    Health Czar

    Former head of Medicare / Medicaid. Strong Health Care Rationing proponent. She is married to a reporter for The New York Times.

    Wow, really? Married to a reporter for the New York Times. What a stinging condemnation of her qualifications.

    Vivek Kundra

    Information Czar

    Born in New Delhi, India. Controls all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors all private Internet emails. (hello?)

    Now really, just how ridiculous does this sound? who can control ALL public information as well as monitor ALL private internet e-mails?

    Kenneth Feinberg

    Pay Czar

    Chief of Staff to TED KENNEDY.. Lawyer who got rich off the 911 victims payoffs. (horribly true)

    Horribly UNTRUE. Fienberg worked on the September 11 Victim Compensation Fund for 33 months pro bono

    John Holdren

    Science Czar

    Fierce ideological environmentalist, Sierra Club, Anti business activist. Claims US business has caused world poverty. No Science training.

    Wow. Wish I had his level of "No Science training" He trained in aeronautics, astronautics and plasma physics and earned a bachelor's degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1965 and a Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1970.

    J. Scott Gration

    Sudan Czar

    Native of Democratic Republic of Congo. Believes US does little to help Third World countries. Council of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United Nations

    Native: being the place or environment in which a person was born or a thing came into being: one's native land. Gration was born in St. Charles Illinois. He grew up in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where his parents worked as missionaries.

    John Brennan

    Terrorism Czar

    Anti CIA activist. No training in diplomatic or gov. affairs. Believes Open Borders to Mexico and a dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military

    Brennan WORKED in the CIA for over 25 years. He was even under consideration to become the head of the CIA. Brennan withdrew his name from consideration for head of the CIA under Obama because of LIBERAL opposition to his CIA service under President George W. Bush and past public statements he had made in support the transfer of terrorism suspects to countries where they might be tortured.

    Aneesh Chopra

    Technology Czar

    No Technology training. Worked for the Advisory Board Company, a health care think tank for hospitals. Anti doctor activist. Supports Obama Health care Rationing and salaried doctors working exclusively for the Gov. health care plan

    I guess being Virginia's fourth Secretary of Technology is No technology training?

    Adolfo Carrion Jr..

    Urban Affairs Czar

    Puerto Rican born Anti American activist and leftist group member in Latin America . Millionaire "slum lord" of the Bronx , NY. Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got from "sweetheart" deals with labor unions. Wants higher taxes on middle class to pay for minority housing and health care

    He is of Puerto Rican descent, but was born in Manhattan NY.

    -- Posted by Amuzeme on Mon, Jul 18, 2011, at 3:09 PM
  • MtnHomer. As i've stated before. The point of the post was not to debate the use of czars. The post could have been about playing tiddlywinks, if the info being presented was incorrect, then i take issue with it.

    If you want to cosider "correct information" minutae, then yes, i'm hung up on it. And BTW, being dean of College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, College Park Maryland is NOT the same as being the dean of Univ of Maryland Business School. You have yourself a nice day.

    -- Posted by Amuzeme on Mon, Jul 18, 2011, at 5:35 PM
  • Oh and just for the record Your Hero Reagan invaded Grenada without congressional approval in 1983 and Bush Sr invaded Panama with out approval in 1989........Funny thing there wasn't talk of impeachment for either one of them

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, Jul 18, 2011, at 6:46 PM
  • XX. INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT

    We, as Idaho Republicans, expect all individuals in government at all levels, including

    elected officials, to conduct themselves within the highest and strictest standards of

    personal conduct in carrying out their duties.

    The people of Idaho demand leaders who will uphold their oath of office and the

    Constitution and are accountable to the people who elect them. We call upon the State

    Chairman to communicate to the party at large information regarding adherence by

    Republican federal office holders, statewide office holders, and State Legislators

    adherence to the state party platform and applicable resolutions adopted at our state

    conventions and party meetings. The State Chairman shall prepare and send to each

    Republican candidate for any federal office, statewide office, and any legislative office a

    request to sign the following statement:

    Candidate Disclosure

    (1) "I have read the Idaho Republican Party Platform. I support the Idaho Republican

    Platform and accept it as the standard by which my performance as a candidate

    and as an officeholder should be evaluated. I certify that I am not a candidate,

    officer, delegate or position holder in any party other than the Republican Party."

    Or,

    (2) "I have read the Idaho Republican Party Platform. Except for the provisions

    specifically noted below, I support the Idaho Republican Party Platform and

    accept it as the standard by which my performance as a candidate and as an

    officeholder should be evaluated. I certify that I am not a candidate, officer,

    delegate or position holder in any party other than the Republican Party."

    The candidate disclosure statements and any exceptions noted therein, shall be posted on

    the Idaho Republican Party internet site at least 30 days prior to the state primary election

    and shall be made available to anyone making a request. Should any candidate fail to

    submit the Disclosure Statement, the Party Chairman will announce this failure no later

    than 40 days prior to the primary election.

    We ask that all candidates certify they are not a candidate, officer, delegate or position

    holder in any party other than the Republican Party.

    Add this to the repeal of the 17th amendment they advocate and see where you end up.

    You speak of commies and socialist. Very interesting. If you carefully read the above, your right to run as a Republican will depend on the decision of the " Central Committee "

    This " central Committee " has already decided that the PEOPLE are too stupid to be trusted with the power to vote for their U.S. Senator. How long until they decide the PEOPLE are too stupid to vote on other things? How long until we see the return of the Alien and Sedition Acts? How long till the 1st and 2nd amendment are tossed out the window because the voice of dissent poises a threat to the " Central Committee "?

    You speak at great length about the loss of freedom in our country. Beware. There are those in the dominating party who will someday come after YOU! What will you do? They will have taken away your guns because you are not pure enough. They will have taken away your right to run for office because you are not pure enough. They will have taken away your right to free speech and freedom of assembly because you are not pure enough.

    How long until the entire Bill of Rights are tossed out the window?

    I am an Independent, I trust no politician. I especially don't trust anyone who says " Place your power in me and trust me." for he is the one who will come back to haunt you for life.

    There is a stinking mess everywhere I look in this country. Of that there is no doubt. But before looking to try and resolve other peoples problems or views, look in your own back yard and recognize the threat to the very freedoms you and others have fought and died for. The threat is real. It is coming. Take a step back and look at the whole picture my friend.

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Tue, Jul 19, 2011, at 6:43 AM
  • IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME.........AND THE INSULTS COME FLYING.........."BULLY ON THE PLAYGROUND"...LOOK WHO IS TALKING.....YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING.............

    -- Posted by lamont on Tue, Jul 19, 2011, at 9:32 AM
  • Zook No matter what the situation was Reagan never got Congressional Approval.........And either did Bush Sr....... So you see Obama isn't or wasn't the only President that did this. And if I dig deeper I bet there are some more......

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Tue, Jul 19, 2011, at 9:57 AM
  • HEWBET...glad to see your out there....havnt been here for awhile....not into chat rooms....the debate became a my way or the hiway.....and the name calling became sactioned.....so it was time for me to do something better....i hope you have been having a great summer we have been busy.ck the web site were in your area a lot trio and quintet. click on the event it will tell you which format we are in, quintet is the most fun ......have a good one.you can e mail the web site.....latter

    -- Posted by lamont on Tue, Jul 19, 2011, at 12:47 PM
  • Hello HewBet

    Glad to see you back Not much has changed. Here on the blogs some speak of having the right to your opinion, but if yours differs from a certain some one you get called names and etc.

    Its not just Bachmans husband that believes prayer will answer gayness, she also believes the same thing. I wonder if that will work for her husband? lol !

    I'm disappointed in Cain... Down in Murfreesboro, Tn which is a town of 100,000 people. Out of that there's a group of about 600 people that are fear monger's and when they got wind of the Muslims wanting to build them a Mosque (which by the way the Muslims have been there since 97) because their congregation grew and they needed more room they became fearful. They think they might congregate to make terrorist plans against the United States...

    Don't they realize they don't have to build a Mosque to make terrorist plans? They can meet up anywhere...... So they take it to court and the Judge says they can build their Mosque because they are citizens of our Country and they have that right just as any other religious group has.

    Now they plan on taking it to the supreme court and Cain said to the 600 people against the building of the Mosque " I have your back"

    The Sharia law might work in another country but we don't let anyone enforce this law. If there is any stoning they will be caught and go to Prison. We don't condone Murder here...

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Tue, Jul 19, 2011, at 1:11 PM
  • Strange, I don't see the Central Committee being called a bunch of Communist, or Fascist or any other name.

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Tue, Jul 19, 2011, at 2:12 PM
  • Zook how about The Iran/contra affair under your Hero's watch in 1985 - 86 that don't count either? Sales of weapons to Iran and I believe Oliver North was involved in that. They didn't get congressional approval ?

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Tue, Jul 19, 2011, at 3:13 PM
  • I started to tell you and then i thought your just feeling what i felt.You once asked me why i continued to engage......so now i ask you.... why are you???????.i can tell you what is wrong probally better you see it for what it is.I think amuzene has already got it.i know some other people have,royincaldwell,junkyardog we are not alone. .....ask again in a few days.....hint there is a pattern cloaked in nationalism.go back and reread his posts..........see ya

    -- Posted by lamont on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 3:34 AM
  • hommer do you have a guilty consience i did not call your name...i could have been talking about anyone.So before you try this again why dont you go back and look at your references that MAYBE i could say were aimed at me,or ms m or any number of people.Do not attempt to project on to me.WE ALL KNOW THAT ONE,NICE TRY.LEAVE IT ALONE.

    -- Posted by lamont on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 9:33 AM
  • We are still hanging our dirty laundry out on the clothesline. Our neighbors are pointing out the obvious stains and flaws.

    However, no one seems to want to really wash the dirt clean, they only want to point out that it is still dirty.

    My question is are we not entitled to our opinions without denigrating someone else? I take exception also to the snide remarks about Bachman and her husband.

    Whether you agree with her politics or personal beliefs, show her the respect that she deserves. She has not been hateful to you personally, She only had the gall to run for office and be a conservative to boot.

    And whether you have a clear understanding about our country's history or not, keep in mind, that if it all falls apart, it will be EVERYONE"S Fault, not just a politcal party or two.

    We are still using our words as weapons and not bothering to take care of the casualties left in the field of battle.

    It is only when you can recognize who your true enemy is, that you can make the difference that we desperately need in this country. I will give you a hint, it isn't a political party or any other organiziation.

    So take a step back and bite your tongue. And stop your fingers from typing!

    Destruction can take many shapes and forms, and while we are discussing our dirty laundry, the real culprit is boldly walking past us in the street.

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 9:35 AM
  • Yes

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 10:01 AM
  • KH Gal

    If your offended by snide remarks about Bachman what are your feelings about all the names Obama has been called right here on these blogs?

    If I made a list of them I would run out of room !

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 10:03 AM
  • And of coarse Homer your not one of those that cast insults and bite ankles !

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 10:29 AM
  • I'm sorry to burst your bubble but I don't have any cohorts on here. I comment solo...... some of us seem to somewhat agree and believe in blogs to be wrote with truth not fiction....

    Thanks for the tip on "Course" us old folks tend to forget how words are spelled.....

    You have a good day too. I know I will. I'm doing something fun..........sewing Cute Aprons today....

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 11:16 AM
  • I accidentally erased my response, which was probably good.

    Two wrongs do not make a right. Michele Bachman has conducted herself well and should be admired for that.

    As for Obama. If you are stating his record as president so far, I am not sure it that is calling him names. If you are describing his behavior, I think that should pass too.

    I personally wouldn't call him for supper, but that is just my opinion.

    Lets agree that we both have ugly dogs, but I will respect your right to love yours if you respect my right to love mine.

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 11:17 AM
  • One thought kept coming to my mind these last few weeks so I looked it up to be official. I can't help but think we have several who continuously "call the kettle black"! Of course they will be the very same that deny it for themselves. Kind of like using "derogative names" to tell people to quit the name calling. If it wasn't so sad it would be funny!

    "DON'T CALL THE KETTLE BLACK: It happens quite often when someone makes a post to remind others of civility but writes it in an uncivil tone. Occasionally, someone will call other people names while at the same time reminding them to not make personal attacks. The irony is simply staggering. "Yes, but he started it" is a poor excuse and will not shield you from any of the consequences of your behavior. Just don't do it. When reminding another user of a policy or guideline regarding behavior, it is well-advised to consider whether you yourself have been following the rule in question. Otherwise, tedious arguments about arguing are likely to ensue."

    -- Posted by Brenda Fincher Publisher MHNews on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 11:47 AM
  • Yay Brenda!

    I am not without sin, but I will try to do better.

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 11:59 AM
  • K H Gal

    I guess you must of had blinders on when Obama has been called Idiot, Satan, Hitler, Communist and more on here. I don't have time to go through the blogs and find more but there is a lot more than what I just said.

    I also find it odd that you would be offended about someone calling Bachmans's husband a name but aren't offended by what Obama has been called..

    And she will be out by the time the primary gets here.......

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 12:58 PM
  • MsM:

    I have never advocated name-calling and would like to point out that I don't have blinders on.

    Like I said, two wrongs do not make a right. And just because someone else called Obama a name does not mean that I think that it is right. Nor is it right for someone to call another candidate sexist names that cannot be mentioned on this page.

    We all have a responsibility to mend our ways and as far as I am concerned it starts with me.

    If Obama sets the tone for ridiculing and name-calling in a press conference or a speech, isn't he wrong too? And he has done this many times, including telling us where we can ride on the bus.

    Somewhere the line has to be drawn from the top down and examples have to be set. I include myself in that catagory.

    I once had a teacher who said the word uh 104 times in class. And that was an average day. My mother told me to stop counting and be kinder.

    My ankle is hurting from jumping into this fray, so I am done. I haven't beaten anyone else's dog and so I can sleep tonight.

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 2:24 PM
  • Homer I was talking about Bachman in reference to K H Gal's comment

    My question is are we not entitled to our opinions without denigrating someone else? I take exception also to the snide remarks about Bachman and her husband.

    It was comparing Obama and the name calling he gets as compared to Bachman on these blogs.

    Nothing to do with earning criticism ............

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 3:00 PM
  • Hew:

    What I was referring to and should have been more clear are the times women have been called sexist names that were running for office.

    Yet men get a free pass if they make a gaffe. All women should be outraged when we have been called filthy or sexist names, yet there are those who are strangely silent.

    I don't call Lamont names nor do I condone anyone else doing so. This is just plain silly.

    BE KIND to one another. It isn't the Disney Channel, but we should all have respect for each other.

    I would shake just about everyone's hand here that I have had contact with. And even give a few of you a hug.

    But I am getting tired of the kids fighting in the back seat for a window space. It doesn't matter who started it. Stop it now!

    -- Posted by KH Gal on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 3:17 PM
  • WOW Homer why do you keep butting in I was talking to K H Gal and I believe I referred to her when starting my comment. Please don't respond to my comments Back off ! A while back you even said you would never respond to my comments and you can't even stay true to yourself !! You need to go sit in the corner, give yourself time out !!

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 3:54 PM
  • Homer

    I have twice told you I was responding to K H Gal and you keep answering me. The first time I was trying to be nice to you by explaining I was commenting to K H Gal The second time you were getting on my nerves (a little) but this 3rd time seems to be a game your playing........and this will be my last time I am telling you I was RESPONDING to k H GAL

    HELLO !! Do you Get it now HOMER ??? Stop Responding to what I have to say....Try to keep that in mind OK? Are we on the same Page now??

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 4:36 PM
  • YES I DO REMEMBER AND WHEN IT WAS SAID I KNEW WHAT WOULD HAPPEN......THE thing that gets me is how he has gotten away with it for so long.He turns it around and says I AINT DONE NOTHIN.

    YES YES YES the name garbage would stop just like that....FUNNY HOW he threatens me i tell him anytime figure it out and walk up swinging and he shuts up.He threatens you and does the same thing,seems to me you would stop threatening.I guess he figures my age would be to his advantage,its not. i dont have anything to loose,or anything to impress so i fight in the survival mode that is a dangerous place to be.

    ANYHOW...... KH GAL YOU KEEP BEING A LADY THATS A GOOD THING....YOU TOO MS M

    HEW i dont want to get this out in public so i am trying to figure how to get it to you.I SEPERATE THIS FROM THAT. I DONT NEED A DISTURBANCE DURING A PERFORMANCE,AND I WOULD NOT REACT VERY WELL AND NEITHER WOULD THE GROUP.

    -- Posted by lamont on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 6:29 PM
  • HEWBET...funny thing i was just getting ready to do the same thing,

    i am told the machine you have is a good one.i use a fostex to record live ,does a pretty good job .i will be out your way friday 6-8 at wood river cellars they do a dinner wine tasting thing and kids are allowed.great venue .acoustics suck but we make it work.

    i was thinking of doing the same thing on u tube my daughter said she will do the recording we shall see.I think zook is being modest he has played to long not to be able to do it all.yes i am a jazzer but music is music.

    Zook he is proud of his country he may not be proud of some of the things it has done.they are both proud believe me.I am disappointed that the country is not proud of them,but that comes from most of the country really not knowing anything intimate about blacks in this country.if they did they would understand.its kinda like you know about me but you dont know me,hard to explain

    latter

    -- Posted by lamont on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 7:45 AM
  • Zook the names I seen being called Obama on these blogs started over on Kim's blogs....... I had started reading the blogs (2009) and was shocked to read the names our President was being called by Citizens of this Country.....

    I come from the old school and when married to a military man while active, I would never dare say those names being called the President.. If I did most likely my husband would of been thrown out of the service, If I had been caught..... I guess we have more freedom of speech today then we ever have had.... I can remember back during the Vietnam War and there were protest Marches all over the country. I at one time wanted to join one of those Marches and I was told because I was a spouse of a Military Man I couldn't do it.. From that I learned to have respect for any President and I try very hard to continue doing that.

    And just for the record my Husband Pat of over 30 years was a viet nam vet who went there 4 times and had on one of those trips been shot over in Cambodia... He never got a metal because remember we were never there?

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 9:22 AM
  • I'm still waiting for that long list of accomplishments from this administation that someone asked for? Probably waiting for one to happen.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 2:05 PM
  • SIMPLE COMMENT. Stay on topic of the story, PERIOD. All other derogatory, threatening, nasty, name-calling comments will be deleted. End of discussion. If you don't like it, make your own web page and blog spot and/or banter box. Some people want to share a story and others want to read a story and have adult conversation. We hope to provide that.

    -- Posted by Brenda Fincher Publisher MHNews on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 2:19 PM
  • ZOOK ....I WASNT HERE WHEN YOU WENT AFTER BUSH..

    I CAN ONLY DEAL WITH THIS........IF you only want to see bad that is all you will see.I saw bad things in BUSH AND i saw good things.IF BEFORE YOU DO ANYTHING YOU ARE JUDGED YOU LOOSE OR WIN WHICH EVER.....CAN DO NO WRONG AS CAN DO NOTHING RIGHT. IT IS CALLED FIRED BEFORE HIRED.IT IS USUALLY A PERSCRIPTION FOR FAILURE.

    Saw it in the military and civilian life,so have you.I try to understand why something is done other than the politics of it.I cant believe any person seeks the presidency with bad intentions it is not worth it.THEREFOR IF THE POWERS TO BE....THE REAL POWER SEN AND CONGREES GO INTO THE MODE THERE IN AND HAVE BEEN I DONT CARE WHO YOU ARE YOU LOOSE.THERE IS NOT ANYTHING THAT HAS BEEN PUT FORTH THAT HAS NOT BEEN OPPOSED ONE WAY OR THE OTHER AND THAT HAS BEEN ALL POLITICS. WHEN A LEADER STATES FROM DAY ONE OUR GOAL IS TO MAKE HIM A ONE TERM PRESIDENT I DONT KNOW HOW WE COULD REASONABLY EXPECT THAT ANYTHING CONSTRUCTIVE WOULD GET DONE,IMPOSSIBLE.

    Now consider that OK.Me personally if I HAD MY WAY I would tell him dont bother running you have better things to do,use your energy constructively. Unless the mindset of crucification changes nothing will change.He cant do it alone.

    Those who crave an ultra conservative AMERICA NEED TO DO SOME HOMEWORK AND SEE WERE THAT LEADS. THOSE OF US WHO FEEL POWERLESS AND DISENFRANCHISED WILL NO LONGER STAND IDLE AND BE AMERICA'S SLAVES.WE WILL HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE AND CONTROL OF OUR DESTINEYS.WE WILL NOT BE EXCLUDED AGAIN EVER........UNLESS YOU PLAN ON KILLING US ALL THAT IS THE WAY IT WILL BE...OR OUR COUNTRY WILL BE TORN APART.yes we are a center right country,but that is not what i am hearing.I WILL NOT GO BACK TO THE WAY IT WAS IN THE 40'S-50'S.....YOU MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMFORTABLE WITH THAT I WAS NOT AND NEITHER WERE MY PARENTS.

    TIMES have changed and we as a country need to deal with it or we will get left behind.We have the why's and werefores we need to get on with it.

    To stand on the sideline and watch people being mistreated and then say i dont condone it does not abdecate your responsibilty. If you dont say anything you are condoning it and guarantying you will be next.....latter

    -- Posted by lamont on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 3:07 PM
  • GREAT.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    -- Posted by lamont on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 4:39 PM
  • Hey Hewbet

    If I can talk my husband into going to Eagle.....I will be there ! I love a couple of the songs.......especially the old Etta James song "At Last"

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 6:55 PM
  • Perry won't make the Primary ! In 2009 he said Texas Could Secede Leave the Union....

    Even the Republicans didn't like this statement

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 9:56 PM
  • HHEWBET....I HAVE HAD THE SAME PROBLEM...I THOUGHT IT WAS MY COMPUTER BUT ITS NOT.try to go back and then forward or if you run 7 close and reopen with the restore session.some times it comes back after i go to another program kinda weird.yes tested for virus etc,so really i dont know what to tell you.well got to go .....did you hear something???????

    -- Posted by lamont on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 4:53 AM
  • There are 2 sides to the texas story,so go to ...bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-08/closer-look-proves-texas-path-to-u-s-employment.

    THERE ARE NO PERFECT MODELS there are good parts to it and there are bad,and a funny thing immergration plays a part in it.One glaring fact is wages in texas are 3 rd lowest in the nation.Anyhow read the article,37% sounds good at face value but is it really? BASED ON THE ARTICLE THE RICH ARE GETTING RICHER AND THE POOR ARE GETTING POORER.Take a look we will all see what we want to see anyway.

    -- Posted by lamont on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 5:38 AM
  • I wonder why this group in Washington is so inept when we have so many problems and they are only making it worse. I can't find anything on what the President wants to do to cut spending but only that he wants to raise taxes. Before the election he tells us he is going to do things differently and congressional approval will come before we go anywhere to war. He says will we will bring our troops home soon after he is elected. He says we will have a immigrant policy. He says we will have an energy policy. This will be the most transparent admin in history. Jobs will return if only we spend trillions and print money and take over private business. And it has to be done now we can't wait. And now three times in the last week I hear him say it is Bush who caused this. He passes a health care plan that will bankrupt us. He clearly is ruining this country and some will gladly vote for him again. Put a conservative name on this blog and you will have three people rag on him right away and still defend this admin to no end.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 7:37 AM
  • GO READ THE ARTICLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    The president asked for corporate loopholes to be closed. So whats wrong with that? The taxe cuts in place cost the nation 4.3 trillion over the last decade.I dont care about the cuts they are going to happen but you cant fix things based on cut alone.

    How about moving incentives to bring jobs back from overseas,how about redundancy in government,how about the congress and the senate giving up there pay increases,how about them paying for there health care,how about you having to serve longer than 5 yrs to get a retirement ck from either of those bodys.there is no company in america that you get vested to retirement in 5 yrs.US the middle class should not have to pay for the ineptness of government.we did not pay for those wars as they were being prosecuted the bill is comming due now.Also the cost calculated for those wars leave out some important figure like continuing cost due to medical,insurance,contractor wages and guarantees and a host of other things,to include wear and tear on equipment retro fits, depo maint on a more frequent schedule, hi time replacments.i could go on.

    This cannot be layed at the feet of just one administration and if you think one can fix that in 3 yrs you are sorely mistaken .If you see that as support you are wrong how about looking at it as reality.

    RIGHT TO WORK.....it puts ppeople to work and it depresses wages,THAT WOULD NOT BE BAD IF THE COST OF LIVING WAS REDUCED ALSO BUT IT IS NOT.go check out the poverty level and people on assistance in those states.TO INCLUDE IDAHO.

    IF we want to return to the elderly being further in poverty, then continue to target there safety net.If you want the insurance companys to have more of your money then let there part of the economy prevail and soon you wont be able to afford a doctor period,that is were it is heading.IF YOU COUNT THE AVERAGE WAGE AGAINST THE COST OF LIVING YOU WILL WONDER HOW PEOPLE ARE SURVIVING,BECAUSE THAT IS ALL THERE DOING.

    The debate on the dept ceiling should not be happening at the peril of the nations credit rating......The needed changes are a debate on its own merit and that is what should happen.YOU AND I ARE BEING HELD HOSTAGE BY BOTH SIDES AND THAT SHOULD NOT BE,ESPECIALLY WHEN DEFAULT WILL IMPACT US HARDER THAN ANYTHING ....YES US.....I HOPE YOU DONT THINK THIS WILL HURT THE RICH,IT WONT.

    FOOD FOR THOUGHT........

    -- Posted by lamont on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 11:06 AM
  • Here you go have fun picking all of it apart

    FYI # 37 Means he set up to help familys of the fallen with expenses

    http://www.bspcn.com/2010/10/18/things-obama-has-done/

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 1:30 PM
  • NIXON GOT US OUT OF NAMM......THAT IS RICH....HE SOLD US OUT IS WHAT HE DID........I know i left a lot of friends there and i know a lot of others did too their names are on the wall.GO BACK AND CHECK WHAT HENRY KISSENGER had to say.

    FUNNY NO SNIDE NAMES FOR REPUBLICANS WONDER WHY????????.HERE WE GO AGAIN

    TRUE PATRIOT.....RIGHT ....seems i remember and AMNESTY program.But we wont mention that,among other things to include iran ,contra.....give me a break.....NONE of them are perfect and a R infront or behind your name doesnt give you a step up to heaven.

    -- Posted by lamont on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 1:57 PM
  • LETS SEE ......you do the crime you do the time......then we are sopposed to call it even and the person gets a chance to redeem themselves.But we get some people who decide that they are entitled to use that as a means to browbeat, denergrate and control.Now im not sure who put people like that in charge,but it seems to me that somewhere i heard do onto others as you would have them do onto you.Christian,conservative thought.BUT i guess if your not from the right that doesnt count...you go on the HATE list, from which they start to act out on wether you are a good person or wether they are going to make you a bad person which they have already decided you are.DOESNT sound AMERICAN TO ME.

    Now im sure that one persons opinion will not affect the outcome of a persons life but i am sure that the person who is attacked can use it as a source of strength,i would.

    WHO IS INCHARGE ANYWAY???????someone keeps telling people what to do.....why??????? you want to be the boss go run your own site then you can block,delete etc seems like the thing to do......!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    -- Posted by lamont on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 3:06 PM
  • And your point is? He did his time and he can comment on here just as much as you can.... When he used Jessie James as his screen name he told us he had been a bank robber and did his time.

    At least we know who he is ! Who are you Homer? maybe your a criminal hiding out under the screen name Mtnhomer

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 3:32 PM
  • HewBet

    I'm happy your staying, don't let homer chase you away....

    Next Wednesday will work better for us to go to Lamonts gig

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 4:31 PM
  • Maybe we can meet some time soon... I heard there's going to be a lot of traffic in Boise tonight with some big events going on..... So we decided next Wednesday when traffic should be lighter.....

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Fri, Jul 22, 2011, at 5:24 PM
  • HOMMER HAVE YOU GOT ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO TELL US ??????????

    GOOD BAD OR INDIFFERENT AT LEAST WE KNOW HE'S BEEN HERE AND HE WASNT ON THE COUCH...........HAHAHAHAHAHAHA .... HOW SMALL.....

    WE KNOW WHO IT MATTERS TOO DONT WE ???????

    this is not worth the time and it is demeaning to say the least.... HONESTY counts for something in most peoples eyes........bye

    -- Posted by lamont on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 1:27 AM
  • I think this blog started out as"never let a crisis go to waste" I read that the President in trying to sell his tax raises said that he does not want and will not accept a deal in which he is asked to do nothing.He said he would be able to keep hundreds of thousands of dollars of income he doesn't need (he's rich). Maybe if he had to pay for his wife's expensive life style and pay for the 120,000 dollar "date night" or the million dollar trip to Africa or really big staffs instead of us the tax payer he wouldn't be so fast to say that. Just a thought.Follow the gelt.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 6:48 AM
  • You guys certainly have given me a good chuckle this morning...........

    I don't know where your getting your TV Channels from.......maybe Mars ....

    We all know Boehner keeps walking off and congress has been taking days off or even only working on the cuts for 2 hrs in a day......We also know the Republicans don't want to compromise and we also know they pledged to not raise any taxes.....they are so foolish !

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 8:55 AM
  • IS there a problem with the presidents...wealth??MOST OF THEM ARE AND THE FIRST LADY IS NOT DOING ANYTHING ANY OTHER HASNT DONE....WHAT IS YOU PEOPLES PROBLEM...AND you say were not treating them any different. How do you say that with a straight face.AGAIN YOUR EXPECTATIONS OF WHAT WE ARE ALL ABOUT IS SO SCREWY. WE HAVE AND POSSES THE SAME AS ANY OTHER PERSON,WHAT YOU SEE IN TV IS GARBAGE STOP BELIEVING IT.My parents owned there own home,they had 2 cars,i went to h.s as did all my siplings,we went on vacations,i was a boy scout,and acolyte in church,we had a ymca ,with pools etc.difference being we had as many and more obstacles to overcome than white americans but guess what we did it.It would seem some people here think somebody gave us something.....WRONG...we worked for it, just like you did and so did this PRESIDENT AND HIS WIFE. HES RICH GET OVER IT.......AND HE DIDNT SELL DRUGS TO GET IT......ENOUGH ALREADY

    -- Posted by lamont on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 9:57 AM
  • I think it was BHO who brought up his wealth and I've heard it so many times that I'm getting used to him saying he's rich.I could care less how he got his money. I remember Mr Clinton was like that too, always bringing up how much he was worth, and biting his lower lip trying to explain it to his followers (not nice to be rich and a liberal president). They both act like it is a crime to be rich and then grab as much as they can, in any way they can, and spend the working man's money like there is no tomorrow. I guess it's because they are all smarter than us. And they all do it is a good enough explanation for some, but not for me. I can't see why people defend this type of behavior when it their money. It's not about his wealth,it's about the tax payer's wealth.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 12:09 PM
  • RIGHT SKEETER.....FOR YOUR INFORMATION MOST OF HIS WEALTH COMES FROM WRITTING BOOKS.AND HE IS NOT THAT WEALTHY COMPARED TO SOME.....NOW HIS COMMENT WAS MADE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE FACT THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING TO PAY MORE AND THAT SOME POLICYS WERE GOING TO COST HIM TOO.....It would be nice if comments were taken in the context they were given and not twisted.Grap anyway they can.....say what?????? BASED on the report in the statesman today you must be talking about corporate AMERICA ???????? CARE TO COMMENT ON THAT?????????? That is a slap at working people and the catch 22 about the economy is also explained in the article it is and intresting read todays paper.I am not defending because there is not anything to defend.THE ARROGANCE OF WEALTH IS WELL DEFINED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE ......IF YOU LOOK.

    -- Posted by lamont on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 12:52 PM
  • Another Chuckle

    National 2012 Election

    Barrack Obama 48%

    Michelle Bachmann 41%

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 2:03 PM
  • I saw an article the other day that said 80 percent of Americans are mad with congress and the president. I'd be surprised if many can be re-elected in either place with those numbers.I'd trust business people much more than politicians as they hold so much more power over a person in a never ending grab for our money and control of our rights. I have lots of younger folks in my family who will end up living and working the rest of their lives to pay off this debt. Don't know if they will ever be able to pay off the debt if this administration is re-elected. Problem is a lot of people who get something for nothing can't wait to vote for him again.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 3:35 PM
  • Have any of you given any thought to why our Middle Class is Shrinking? I've been hearing talk a lot lately on TV about the middle class is getting smaller. We have more rich and more poor while there is less of the middle class.

    http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2011/03/23/saving-americas-shrinking-middle-...

    I then heard on the news today that Idaho Senator Labrador held a meeting in Meridian to answer questions abut the crisis that's going on in our Country with the Debt and figuring out what cuts to make. One lady asked why we can't tax the rich? They cut Labrador's answer off so I didn't get to here what he had to say.

    One thing I will say is I give him a big applause for holding that meeting. Not very many Politician's will do that.......

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 6:27 PM
  • Yes and you don't have to own a large corporation to buy from other country's. When my business was going better then it is now I placed some orders with factory's over in China because they could produce hand made products faster then I could make them and I wanted to see what quality their products were.

    I used to talk to many different people living over in China, once word gets out that you place orders with them, you get them all coming after you.

    Most the ones I talked to were very young and one boy I talked to many times, he even called me once, and sent me pictures of when he went on vacation with him family. His family owned the factory that I bought from and he was their only child. He called me because he was wanting me to go to China to tour their factory.....

    There was a girl that used to know when I was on my computer and she would im me and we would chat she lived somewhere in the middle of china, somewhere where it was very cold...

    I stopped buying from them a few years back because of the shipping cost got to be way to much..

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 6:46 PM
  • The only products I got from China was dog clothing. The quality was much better then you see in Walmart. The dog sweaters they sell at walmart are made on a machine and are thin. The ones I make and that I got from China were hand knit with good quality yarn. I'm an experienced knitter so they couldn't pass anything off on me as hand knit unless it was hand knit.

    I don't know if I am allowed to give my web address here, but if you type in Marilyns Creations it should bring it up......

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sat, Jul 23, 2011, at 9:22 PM
  • TRUE CONSERVATIVE TALKING POINTS.....THIS TIME WITH INSULTS........WELFARE,ILLEGALS,SOCIALIST,COMMUNIST,EURO WEST,AND STUPID.....DOESNT GET ANY BETTER THAN THAT.

    THE CONSERVATIVE RIGHT SET OUT TO SET FAILURE IN MOTION FROM DAY ONE ......SO MAYBE THEY NEED TO TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILTY IF AND WHEN IT HAPPENS.

    IN THE MEANTIME MAYBE THEY OUGHT TO JUST KEEP THERE WISH LIST GOING ON WHO THEY INTEND TO ELIMINATE......AND REMEBER IF YOU ARE NOT RIGHT ENOUGH FOR ????????? YOU WILL BE ON IT.

    -- Posted by lamont on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 8:51 AM
  • What do you think of this ?

    The Rev. Al Sharpton apparently will have a new pulpit soon on MSNBC. The civil-rights activist and radio host will be given the 6 p.m. Eastern time slot that opened as a result of the lineup shake-up that occurred with the departure of Keith Olbermann in January, The New York Times reports.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 8:59 AM
  • I will tell you what I think MsMarylin, Good for him. I have better things to do and think about than him,watch him, or believe much of what he says.In my thoughts he has always been a race monger. I have problems with going to get a half tank of gas in my old truck and paying 40 dollars yesterday and this admin wishing I had to pay more. I have a hard time getting up at 4 this morning on my day off to got work so those in Washington can go to Spain and spend millions.And they want to raise my taxes. I have a problem with my kids and grandkids living in a country that is changing so fast for the worse and there seems nothing I can do. As someone who has worked for 57 years in a row I'm tired MsMarylin of the spend other people's money that Washington is so good at. I'm tired of watching all my life as the second ammendment is always attacked by those that are so much smarter than me. I'm tired of people sitting on their butt and mooching off good hard working people. I'm tired of Washington in oh so many ways. Washington doesn't give anything to anybody they didn't take from somebody else. Guess I'm just tired.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 9:40 AM
  • I'll tell you what else I'm tired of, 6000 dollars a year for health care and with this admin's coming care probbaly a third more.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 9:47 AM
  • Can you believe that Boehner wants to only raise the debt ceiling until the end of the year. Geez if that gets passed, in about 5-6 months we get to run the movie again.......

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 10:22 AM
  • That's not the way I'm hearing it. Remember the pledge of not raising taxes and if Bohnner goes along with raising some taxes on the rich what will happen to the Speaker of the House.... His own party will throw him out......

    And what about those Bush Tax Breaks that were suppose to be temporary ? What about Bohnner walking out twice?

    Raise the debt ceiling temporary for only 6 months?

    Hire and Fire with in your own ranks.hmmmmmmm that's what Bohnner is in fear of.

    Changing the subject....Hows your hand today?

    I'm thinking you could have that other itis Bursitis ...Buy a tube of Capsaicin and rub on your hand..... Just make sure you don't touch your eyes after you apply it ... Wash your hand real good.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 1:39 PM
  • Wasn't it this admin that extended the tax break on the "Rich" after reaming Bush before, during and after the election? And then when the economy is at the brink they extend it because a tax raise will ruin the economy. I saw Senator Reid say taxes are voluntary.He is one weierd dude.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 2:50 PM
  • Bush's tax breaks were extended

    On December 15, 2010 the Senate passed the compromise package with an 81--19 vote, with large majorities of both Democrats and Republicans supporting it. Near midnight of December 16, the House passed it 277--148, with it getting only a modest majority among Democrats and a large majority among Republicans

    This has added $3.3 Trillion to the National Debt

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 3:08 PM
  • once just once it would be nice if all post refrained from snide remarks,i know most of us are trying and most of us have got it going.I AM SURE THAT WE CAN TALK WITHOUT NAME CALLING AND SNIDE REMARKS.ONCE JUST ONCE IT MIGHT SET THE TRAIN ON THE RIGHT TRACK......JUST MAYBE......

    -- Posted by lamont on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 3:48 PM
  • Zook Icy Hot is another good one. It's for all the itis's Arthritis Bursitis and Tendinitis

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sun, Jul 24, 2011, at 5:26 PM
  • Big difference in what he is saying. What gets me is he won't make a decision on anything. We need new leadership that's for sure. Gotta go.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 6:04 AM
  • SINCE 2001 WE HAVE RAISED THE CEILING 7 TIMES I THINK.SO THIS IS ONCE HOW GOES THE OTHER 6 ?????? WHATS the point here??????? 2006 WHAT HAS THAT TO DO WITH THE PROBLEM OF TODAY??????? Your list may be valid but isnt it selective?????? i would think to make the argument you would need a more current vote,and more than one especially to be calling hypocrisy.

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 8:10 AM
  • I call it 5 years older 5 years more experienced, 5 years more educated and 5 years more wiser

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 9:24 AM
  • THE SELECTIVITY I WAS TALKING ABOUT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS COLOUR that was not the point.The point is managment is fluid and things change and you manage based on what is happening now,and your position in the managment chain now.

    YOU FOLKS NEED TO REMEMBER SOMETHING IF I WANT TO BRING UP HIS COLOR I WILL,I WILL NOT TAP DANCE IT. THIS IS NOT 2006 AT LEAST THE LAST TIME I LOOKED.SO there was no defense implied except from a managment stand point.I dont know a politician that has held firm to every position they ever had or have expuonded on do you??????? that is the point.SO dont tell me about LAST DEFENSE that is garbage.SO maybe stupid is the person who interpreted the wrong way.

    ZOOK what you said is true,however it is hard to accept that. That is not the way it is voiced.Voice it that way,and it will be more palatable.You dont know how many right wing people i talk to,A LOT and we agree on a lot.We dont assault or insult each other verbally to talk.AND I resent any one who has to resort to that.This country has been sitting here doing some very bad things to a lot of people in the name of capitilism.Now that everyone is caught in the web over the years we are angry and it has been class warfare for years and yes we were warned we ignored.Your right, wrong place wrong time,easy to makle a scapegoat out of someone else when we should look at ourselves.WE need to recognize that the equality we seek can only happen when we see it all and not out of rose tinted glasses.DONT TRY TO LABEL ME....YES I LEAN LEFT BUT THAT DOESNT MAKE ME OR ANYONE INFLEXABLE I LIKE MANY ARE RECEPTIVE TO MANY THOUGHTS AND IDEAS AS ARE MANY ON THE RIGHT WHO JUST LEAN RIGHT.THE MIDDLE IS GREAT THE EXTREMES COST US AND THAT IS WERE WE ARE AT,EXTREMES GET NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE DONE IN THE LONG TERM.

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 12:25 PM
  • Remember Obama released oil from our reserve so the prices would drop for awhile. I think he said for 60 days but I could be wrong.

    off Topic Hewbet are you going to meet up on Wednesday evening? I'm still thinking about it even though its a little late for us but if we come we're meeting up with our "Wild Child" lol !

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 2:16 PM
  • THANKYOU HOMMER BUT I REALLY DONT CARE ABOUT WETHER HE IS A LAWYER OR NOT.I CARE ABOUT WETHER HE CAN COMPROMISE FOR THE BENIFITE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT IS ALL I CARE ABOUT.

    I WILL SAY THIS AND THIS IS NOT A KNOCK AT HIM THEY NEED TO GO BACK AND DEAL WITH THE ACCOUN TABLE ACT.....BECAUSE THAT IS NOT WHAT IS HAPPENING.ON either side of the aisle.

    From what you said you have made payroll,taxes etc.so have i that doesnt mean that the solutions we seek are that simplistic and they need to be thought out.I dont think any of them are really in touch with what happens to you and i, they are insulated from it.Cut yes and there are some things that can happen yesterday,but there are some that cant.There are some taxes that can be raised, loopholes shut etc.That too could happen yesterday.......SO DO IT !!!!!!!!!! and quit the garbage it is that SIMPLE if they wanted it to be.

    ME I WOULD START WITH REDUNDANCY.....AND BELIEVE ME THAT IS A BIG ONE.PUT THOSE PEOPLE TO WORK REBUILDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE SIMPLE SO LETS GET IT ON.

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 3:56 PM
  • There's some news coming at 6 pm tonight..From the White House and from Boehner .........separately

    I'm not sure what channel but I seen the announcement on CNN

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 4:46 PM
  • I for one can be ok if the so called Bush taxe cuts had went away.And as far as im concerned they should have, that is why they were sundowned.....if they cost to much they go away.....ie......sundowned.

    So i say if your in the hole you can cut, but with a part time job you fix it better and faster.That is my thought.For me it was about $60.00 from my check,heck they got that when they changed the tables.WELL lets objectively see what is said tonight but i am tired of the bs from both sides.

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 5:39 PM
  • HOW LONG HAS THIS BEEN GOING ON ????????? IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE THE HISTORY OF THESE GRANTS NOT JUST THE LATEST ONES.I WOULD BE WILLING TO BET THEY HAVE BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS.

    I know the VA IS GUILTY MAINLY BECAUSE THEY OCCUPY OLD BUILDINGS WITH HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANCE,BOISE IS A GOOD EXAMPLE.so there are choices that have to be made but there are bigger fish to fry and more worthy.FALSE tax returns those are the criminal ones.lets start with the ones that are at least a million and go from there.VEGAS can pay for there own historical boneyard.....and hommer dont just pick out the ones in democratic districts.I know both sides are guilty and so do you.

    -- Posted by lamont on Mon, Jul 25, 2011, at 8:44 PM
  • I dont think anyone argues the premise of needing real change.THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE IT IS WHAT KIND OF GOVERNMENT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ?????? That is the issue.People who dont respect everyone could not make a good government for me.I SEE THEM AS NO BETTER THAN ANY OTHER DICTATOR WHO WOULD ELIMINATE AND OR SUBJUGATE ANYONE WHO DISAGREED WITH THERE IDEAOLOGY.The freedoms enjoyed now would be compromised to ensure empowerment of that government.I can tell you this as the right would take up arms against and ultra left government the left will take up arms against and ultra right government.Most people who have been and still are subjugated will not be subjugated again that you can bet on.

    I SAID IT BEFORE I WILL SAY IT AGAIN....THE REHETORIC HERE IS SEDIOUS AT BEST

    -- Posted by lamont on Tue, Jul 26, 2011, at 10:48 AM
  • Here's what I found out

    Each year, the President of the United States submits his budget request to Congress for the following fiscal year as required by the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921. Current law (31 U.S.C. § 1105(a)) requires the president to submit a budget no earlier than the first Monday in January, and no later than the first Monday in February. Typically, presidents submit budgets on the first Monday in February. The budget submission has been delayed, however, in some new presidents' first year when previous president belonged to a different party.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Tue, Jul 26, 2011, at 7:48 PM
  • I heard Holder was given a slide show last year on these gun sales. I also heard one arm of goverment was selling and another was wondering where the cartel got the guns and was doing an investigation into it.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Tue, Jul 26, 2011, at 8:49 PM
  • MtnHomer: I watched it and he is saying what I feel is wrong too. There is only so much a person can take of their greed. They look like fools with their blame game. All of them need to grow up. It's time to reduce spending so we have a chance to get out of this mess before it gets worse, as it is headed now.We are broke and they just don't get it. Raising taxes was the only solution offered by this admin for the longest time. We have to cut spending now.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Tue, Jul 26, 2011, at 9:04 PM
  • NEITHER BOEHNER OR THE PRESIDENT SAID A DARN THING CONSTRUCTIVE THE OTHER NIGHT THEY WERE LIKE TWO KIDS IN THE SCHOOL YARD..........I AGREE THAT WE NEED A BALANCED APPROACH ......SO GET ON WITH IT.CHANGE FOR PEOPLE UNDER 55 IS GARBAGE AND SO IS GOING AFTER MEDICARE AND MEDCADE.......there are so many other realistic areas that can be cut it is redicules.We PAID INTO WHAT THEY WANT TO CUT....... WRONG........can i have my money back??????? we know the answer to that. SHUT THE LOOPHOLES AND DO THE RIGHT THING STOP SUBSIDIZING,THE RICHEST CORPORATIONS ON THE PLANET.GIVE TAX BREAKS TO THOSE WHO CREATE JOBS HERE PERIOD.dont want to get on a rant they know how to fix this.....Politics on ourbacks .....needs to stop.

    THE gun investigation for political gain is going to get some agents killed .I would be willing to bet on it.Congress cant keep its mouth shut and therefore information will come out that will id agents under cover and they will die,and there familys.A kid died here some years back,and what they did to him was horrible come to find out he was related to someone who opened there mouth.So if REP ISSA was doing this investigation in secret OK but he's not and that is not good.....I hope they get them out before testimony..

    latter

    -- Posted by lamont on Wed, Jul 27, 2011, at 8:05 AM
  • I'm sure it will be the fault of Bush.

    -- Posted by skeeter on Wed, Jul 27, 2011, at 8:33 PM
  • ZOOK .......I am talking about the people undercover ....are you willing to sacrifice them??i am not..... i did not say i wanted the investigation to go away....i said congress cant keep a secret and will leak stuff that will put those people at risk.....you have a bee in your bonnet about holder and guns ok ok ok. Do you honestly think that they are not going to make political hay of this?????????AND THAT MEANS LEAKS AND ONE UPMANSHIP....PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE SO THAT SOMEONE CAN SCORE POINTS........THAT IS NOT OK.......i am not talking about anyone being above the law,so please deal with what i said.

    -- Posted by lamont on Thu, Jul 28, 2011, at 1:26 AM
  • ARE YOU WILLING TO SACRIFICE THOSE AGENTS??????? THAT IS MY QUESTION.YOUR BEEF WITH ANY ATT GEN THAT IS NOT A 2ND AMENDMENT ADVOCATE IS UP TO YOU.

    IT IS TO A POINT THAT ANY SANE POLICY THAT INVOLVES THE 2ND AMENDMENT WILL ULTIMATLY BE INSANE. PLEASE DONT TRY TO IMPLY THAT EVERY GUN OWNER IS LAW ABIDING ANYMORE THAN EVERY DEMOCRAT WANTS YOUR WEAPON........WHAT I DONT WANT IS SOME INNOCENT BEING KILLED BECAUSE SOMEONE WANTS TO PLAY COP AND BECAUSE... THEY THINK THEY SEE SOMETHING..... THEY KILL SOMEONE FOR NOTHING.BEING PRONE TO GUN VIOLENCE IN THIS COUNTRY I KNOW A LITTLE SOMETHING ABOUT THAT.

    kinda like the cop stopping me an says im looking for someone in a white truck and the one i was driving was yellow.sO WHY DID YOU STOP ME??......ANSWER .....DONT GET SMART........SAY WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    -- Posted by lamont on Thu, Jul 28, 2011, at 9:44 AM
  • Remember...........it's only "rape" if you struggle."

    -- Posted by bazookaman on Thu, Jul 28, 2011, at 10:08 PM

    Wow!!! You've said some pretty uneducated things in the past, but that statement ..........wow!!

    No means NO.

    -- Posted by Pale Ale on Fri, Jul 29, 2011, at 12:41 PM
  • Oh, and BTW When the time comes, you won't even see it coming sweetheart.

    -- Posted by Pale Ale on Fri, Jul 29, 2011, at 12:44 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: