*
Kim's Comments
Kim Kovac

OPERATION GARDEN PLOT

Posted Saturday, October 3, 2009, at 1:36 PM
Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • We go back many many years using the National Guard for crowd control....Remember Kent State, Viet Nam Protester's, any type of protest where there were mass crowds forming.

    When Martin Luther King was killed they had the Military set up on the White House Lawn with M-16's I think that was the choice gun back then, but I could be wrong.

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Sat, Oct 3, 2009, at 3:00 PM
  • *

    bazookaman, what's the title and number on your copy of the Operation Garden plot manual?

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Sun, Oct 4, 2009, at 12:19 PM
  • *

    Thanks!

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Mon, Oct 5, 2009, at 6:06 AM
  • *

    Under the Constitution of the United States and United States Code, the President is empowered to direct federal intervention in civil disturbances to--

    · Respond to state requests for aid in restoring order.

    · Enforce the laws of the United States.

    · Protect the civil rights of citizens.

    · Protect federal property and functions.

    Generally, federal military forces may not give law enforcement assistance to civil authorities without conflicting with the Posse Comitatus Act. However, constitutional and statutory exceptions to this prohibition do exist. The recent emphasis on drug interdiction has led to an increase in those exceptions.

    The NG responds and operates under state laws unless they are federalized, when they operate under the same constraints and laws as federal units.

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Mon, Oct 5, 2009, at 6:16 AM
  • I agree with what you wrote concerning the role of the Guard. IN my other post I did state the following:

    It is easy to see the attempts of the President and his advisors to avoid the debacle involving the National Guard after Hurricane Katrina, when Governor Blanco of Louisiana would not give control of the National Guard over to President and the Federal chain of command. Governor Blanco rightfully insisted that she be closely consulted and remain largely in control of the military forces operating in the State during that emergency. This infuriated the White House, and now they are looking for some automatic triggers--natural disasters, terrorist attacks, or a disease epidemic--to avoid having to consult with the Governors."

    So I am angry that Bush played a part in this as well. Governors are supposed to have the authority to utilize the Guard and Bush was ****** off that he was blocked.

    A President's power must have limits and there needs to be checks and balances, hence the need for congress, governors, judges, police etc.

    Instead, we have a President that wants to do what he wants, when he wants and how he wants. If there is something in his way, then he will get a law passed to change it. If someone opposes him, what will he do? I wonder if the GM executive that he fired just wouldn't tow the line. How many others have been bullied?

    -- Posted by kimkovac on Mon, Oct 5, 2009, at 8:59 PM
  • *

    bazookaman, I'm not sure of your reasoning when you state, "A government that does not ITSELF follow our Constitution, but seeks to impose its own will upon the people, has no authority to do so, and it is our DUTY to throw it off-------------our declaration of Independence is pretty clear on this."

    -- Posted by DaveThompson on Tue, Oct 6, 2009, at 11:03 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: