Letter to the Editor

Most civilians don't have a clue what military life is like

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Dear editor:

Tyson Baker's letter last week stirred up plenty of folks, but one must consider that most civilians have no clue of military life.

A 20+ year career in uniform has nothing at all in common with ANY civilian endeavor. Over the years, I've even heard remarks that military pensions are government giveaways (like welfare), and that people make military careers because they can't handle it on the outside. That so?

I've always been curious, if we had it so good in uniform, how come lines to enlist weren't wrapped around the block? Seems like EVERYBODY would want to get in on this massive "gravy train," wouldn't ya think?

A military enlistment is a CONTRACT, and if you're willing to serve Uncle Sam for 20 years or more, there'll be a "little something" for you at the end if you happen to survive and not end up scattered in pieces on some foreign soil. A service pension is merely Uncle Sam living up to HIS end of the bargain, which really IS a "bargain" for the politicians, who don't have to risk THEIR hides, get shot at, live in a hole and dine on C-rations.

Let's start with this "only 20 years" thing. Time-wise alone, when you figure in all the 12-hour shifts (that you don't get "time and a half" for), the weekends, the holidays, the deployments, it's a lot closer to 30 than it is to 20.

Then there's the freedoms YOU give up so these civilians can keep THEIRS. You will dress, groom and conduct your life to Uncle Sam's liking, not yours. Until your enlistment is up, your life no longer belongs to you. If you don't like your job or the base you're assigned to, that's just tough. YOU signed up for this and do NOT have that "two week notice" clause the civilians do. An Airman for example, turning wrenches on F-15's through the night, is at poverty level. If Uncle Sam had to pay him what his civilian counterpart at McDonnell-Douglas makes, we couldn't even to begin to afford a military.

Got tickets to a rock concert tomorrow night? Family coming to visit? Kid has a softball game this weekend? Really? When the phone rings at 0200 and three hours later you're on the way to God only knows where, your family comes SECOND, son. Depending on service branch, you might be coming home in a body bag or as a "wounded warrior." But then, that's easier than having to try to make it as a civilian, eh? Christmas? Thanksgiving? Easter? Yeah, if "Uncle" doesn't need you MORE somewhere else at the moment. It's a great life. Give it a try.

The bitter truth about "not making it on the outside," is that most CIVILIANS lack the guts to do for REAL what they do on their computer video war games. When the mortar rounds, bullets and bombs are ACTUAL, there ain't no "on," "off" or "re-set" buttons. THEY'RE the ones who couldn't handle it if required. They love that "milk and honey" as long as someone ELSE has to fight for it.

But the pensions few can live on, are pretty much the "same as welfare checks," eh? Sickening what this society has become.

Because of the poor pay, long hours and living conditions, the G.I. was enticed to re-enlist all through the '60s and '70s with all this "free stuff at retirement," as compensation for the lousy wages and sacrifices forced upon him and his family. As that "magic date" got closer, the rhetoric strangely turned into "co-pay," "Tri-Care" and etc. Lied to AGAIN. Then of course, when you DID retire (on a pension you couldn't really live on), you found yourself at 40-45, competing with 20-year-olds for jobs.

When you came home in the late' 60s from "Bang-Bang DaNang" to the "ticker-tape parades" and the "adoring public," you wondered what it was all for, (at least THAT part of it has changed for the better, as today's public is finally blaming the politicians and not the troops).

I have to deal with the V.A. today (courtesy of the Agent Orange that civilians only read about).

I've seen the Wall, and clearly see how our troops TODAY are being misled as well. Amazingly, we still have young warriors willing to sacrifice so our "holier than thou" civilians and ACTUAL welfare recipients don't have to, and the colleges can keep subverting our high school grads into future socialists as this country is continuing to be given away.

Finally, Tyson, all five branches have their own function. As proud as I am having been a combat Marine, I'm sure I can speak for our entire battalion when I say that in really tough and outnumbering situations, there wasn't ONE of us who didn't appreciate seeing those Phantoms (both Marine and AIR FORCE) come streaking down the valleys of Khe Sanh dropping bombs and napalm. Going out on "search and destroy" sweeps, it was always an added comfort just knowing that waves of AIR FORCE B-52's had "carpeted" ahead of us. Most of the old-timers remember "Puff," the C-47's, flying around up there in the dead of night. Whatever uniform you wore, nobody had an easy job.

It's a team effort to get it done. Those "tanks on the borders" you mentioned is a good thing. Too bad they aren't down there right now along the Rio Grande, because THAT'S where they need to be right now, but with Obama trying to stack the deck with "amnestied votes" for 2016, we're not going to see that happen.

-- Mike Bradbury

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Thank you Mike as well. Well put. If they would only pay attention.

    -- Posted by Green Eyed Lady on Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 9:08 PM
  • There must of been something you liked about the Military, you enlisted

    -- Posted by WinterStorm on Fri, Oct 10, 2014, at 10:42 AM
  • Mike,

    I read Tyson's letter and recognized a child-like innocence in the word usage and syntax. I suspect that Tyson is a student and was doing one of two things. One, writing a letter for a school assignment or, two, writing to support a sibling/parent serving in the US Army. I know of no one who honestly believes we have tanks guarding our borders. I could be wrong, I am far from perfect. I'm glad to see that your letter did not throw stones at Tyson. Thank you for that, because one of the things you, and I, joined the military for and fought to protect, was, like it or not, freedom of speech. Even children, including Tyson if I am correct in my thinking, have that right and are usually the ones most truthful about how they really feel. The innocence of a child should never be taken from them and the truthfulness of their words should never be mocked or they grow up learning to lie. I hope Tyson, if a child, hasn't seen the terrible things said in response to his or her letter or having seen it, sees my response here and understands. I am reminded of the words spoken by Ted Kennedy at his brother's funeral. "Some men see things as they are and ask why. My brother saw things as they could be and asked why not." Probably not appropriate here, but I hope, if Tyson is a child, that he or she sees things as they could be and asks why not.

    Randy

    -- Posted by Ramjett on Sun, Oct 12, 2014, at 12:50 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: