Increased enrollment keys emergency school levy

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

The Mountain Home School Board has approved a request for a $437,000 emergency levy to handle an unexpected influx of new students this year.

Unlike the supplemental levy, approved by the voters last year to make up for state funding shortfalls, or bond levies, the emergency levy does not require approval from district taxpayers.

Supt. Tim McMurtrey said the levy, "was put into Idaho Code so that school districts had the funds at the beginning to get the necessary staff and supplies ordered early in September (due to unexpected enrollement increases).

"This has been going on for ages. We just haven't done it since 2003," McMurtrey explained. Historically, the Mountain Home School District has had difficulty estimating the number of students it will have each fall because of the typical summer personnel changes on base.

"I'd like to note that the board chose not to go for the entire amount that they could have requested as they are cognizant of the taxpayers and the possibility of a supplemental levy in the spring," which does require taxpayer approval, McMurtrey said.

"We used to do it often when our enrollment was high -- we just haven't had an influx like this for some time.

"Several of the valley schools have opted to run them as well," McMurtrey said. "I believe Meridian has one for $2.7 million this year because they are up 622 students -- just to put it into perspective."

Once the post-Labor Day enrollment numbers were in the district found that it was up 103 students overall. "Unfortunately," McMurtrey said, "those students are not in one grade level -- but spread throughout the district. "

Idaho Code allows the districts to authorize emergency levies -- when the enrollment is higher than anticipated -- for that year only. "With the emergency levy we were able to reduce class sizes at East Elementary by hiring an additional half-time kindergarten teacher, an additional third-grade teacher and an additional part-time paraprofessional," McMurtrey said.

"We (also) hired an additional second grade teacher at West Elementary and a part-time paraprofessional at the Base Primary School. In addition to those, we will be hiring a one-on-one Special Education paraprofessional for a student entering our district with severe needs."

The emergency levy also will allow the district to purchase the additional textbooks, technology and supplies needed to educate the additional students. "We also realize that there will be more expenses that have not been identified as of yet," he said.

On a typical home of $50,000 taxable value last year the district would collect an estimated $21.30 over the next year.

On a typical farm of $100,000 taxable value the extra taxes are estimated to be $42.60. The amount of dollars to be collected by the levy on a typical business of $200,000 taxable value is estimated to be $85.20.

Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • D-O-G...EIEIO.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Wed, Sep 18, 2013, at 3:55 PM
  • *

    Taxation with representation is great. Wonder what MHSD will have their hands out for next year? This seems to be a common theme with them. Let's not plan on anything since we can vote for a levy and the taxpayer has no input at all. If I had children at home, they might not be able to go to school and instead get a job to help me pay for all the levies. What that would have helped with the overcrowding. Luckily children are all grown.

    -- Posted by B Mullen on Wed, Sep 18, 2013, at 4:41 PM
  • *

    In a community that is affected by the transient nature of the Air Force community, is it really reasonable to assume that the district would be able to predict these extra students would be enrolling in our schools? There is no possible way to anticipate an influx of students like this.

    I look at it this way -- if you go to a restaurant and order something that the kitchen has run out of, they ask you to reorder. You cannot still expect that item to be served to you because they have run out of that particular item. So, if the district has cut back expenses as far as possible, and the legislature has cut back the funds from all Idaho school districts, you would have to conclude that there is no room/money for an additional 100 students. In this comparison, the restaurant has run out of that food -- the district has run out of desks for extra students. Restaurants would turn you away if they had no food to serve, so by this comparison, can the school district turn away those extra 100 students because there are no desks for them? Absolutely not. So what is the school district to do when this situation happens? Ask for an emergency levy.

    It is completely understandable that asking for another levy is yet another drain on our very lean wallets, but when there are no more desks for extra students, as a community we can't, in good conscience, turn them away. I believe it is time to step up and help.

    -- Posted by questionposer on Thu, Sep 19, 2013, at 1:59 PM
  • If it doesn't pass what will we get to hear?

    "We will have to cut extra-curricular programs"

    Then they will get the kids on here trying to champion the levy as if we are all heartless and don't want them to succeed in life.

    I stated on here before, I work hard for MY money. I have to manage my money to stay ahead and save. I can't stop paying taxes but I will vote "no" and against anything and anybody that refuses to be responsible with MY tax money.

    Here's an idea: Ask the Wreck (wecrd) for the money....

    -- Posted by clam chowder on Thu, Sep 19, 2013, at 9:02 PM
  • *

    Werborg:

    Have you ever been responsible for teaching a group of students? I have teachers in my family - the lower the class size, the more effective the teacher and the better student achievement is - period. It has been proven by research that students in a class of 22 fare A LOT better than students in a class of 30. For every additional student added to a class, the effectiveness of the teacher is reduced, no matter how good or experienced the teacher is. If the class sizes can be reduced to even 25, that is far better for student achievement than class sizes of 30 to 35 students, especially in the elementary grades.

    It seems as though there are many stories about "the lies that were told to us about (insert falsehood here)". It also seems that this happened over a dozen years ago. When is it time to start working together and helping the school district instead of bad-mouthing everything they do? The tales of a corrupt or inept school districts are found nearly everywhere, so the negative attitudes I see here are nothing new. However, if our school district is to serve our children, don't you think they deserve a little more consideration?

    -- Posted by questionposer on Thu, Sep 19, 2013, at 9:08 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: