The race for Elmore County Sheriff's Office

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Rick Layher

GOP -- Incumbent

1. Please describe your philosophy of law enforcement and management of the sheriff's office.

My philosophy for management of the sheriff's office, and for law enforcement in general, is to promote and maintain a caring, professional department; one that not only gains the respect and confidence of the citizens while enhancing public safety, but also improves citizens' quality of life through crime reduction and prevention.

These ideals are made possible by a close working relationship with the residents of Elmore County and the surrounding area.

2. What do you believe are the strengths of the sheriff's office?

The strengths of the sheriff's office change from time to time depending on circumstances and personnel, but at this time we have a group of exceedingly professional employees with a real concern for the well-being of the citizens. They genuinely care and will go out of their way to help those in need.

The different divisions of the sheriff's office include: Civil, Patrol, Jail, Marine Division, Detectives, Dispatch, Drivers Licensing, SILD and Court House Security.

The different divisions function interdependently and have a very powerful team dynamic overall. The way the divisions pull together to handle a serious crime or incident makes me proud.

We have a very effective chain of command that not only allows us to deal with incidents in the most efficient way possible, but also ensure accountability for every employee throughout the department.

3. What do you believe are the weaknesses of the sheriff's office (if any) and, if you believe there are weaknesses, how do you propose to correct them?

The weaknesses of the sheriff's office fluctuate in the same way that our strengths do.

Right now a weakness we are dealing with is procedure policy, which is strong in some areas but in need of improvement in others. An example of this is the excellent and comprehensive policy for the jail and its operation, contrasted with the struggle we have had in the creation and maintenance of policy for the patrol divisions.

To remedy the problem, we entered a program funded by our insurance carrier (ICRMP: Idaho Counties Risk Management Program). The program is called Lexipol, and it is an adaptable policy that can be applied and altered as needed to fit a particular department. Most of the sheriff's departments in Idaho have gone to, or are going, to this policy. Overall, this serves to somewhat standardize policy in Idaho. We have completed our version and it has been submitted to our insurance company's attorney for review. We feel that the implementation of Lexipol will be an asset to our department.

Another weakness is low manpower, employee retention, and hiring procedure. We hope that our recent policy change will ensure that we hire quality people with good common sense, and caring, positive attitudes. We've recently had several employees leave, including our two mountain deputies, and the process of replacing them will serve as a good litmus test for the effectiveness of our new hiring policy. Rather than simply being interviewed and hired, the candidates will be doing physical fitness tests and psychological tests and undergoing background checks. The process will take time and hiring will not be immediate, but we believe that the outcome will be better for the citizens.

In regards to retention, we feel strongly that making sure that people are hired and assigned to positions they truly want will help keep them in the department longer. Working to attain higher wages for employees is a must, especially for the mountain deputies. The cost of living in the mountain areas of the county is inherently higher -- what with the cost of fuel and the need to drive further to fill day to day needs. The deputies cannot afford to live in those areas, even with the extra housing allowance included as part of their wages.

I feel we are headed in the right direction in regards to remedying the problem of low manpower. The commissioners allowed for two additional deputy positions in this year's budget, which became effective on Oct. 1.

Once these people are hired, sent to the academy and trained (which takes four to five months), we will be in a position to accomplish a great deal more for the citizens.

The manpower issue has been a problem forever, and has prevented us from developing and implementing programs that the citizens are in need of. We aren't unlike any other sheriff's office in the state, and the programs you can put in place is entirely dependent on the manpower you have, which is dependent on how much each county can afford.

4. Where do you believe the sheriff's office should focus its attention?

I believe that we should focus on a number of things in the department.

I personally need to focus on the chain of command, making sure everything is getting done, and that everyone is doing their jobs as they should.

I believe we should continue to focus on increasing rehabilitation programs in the jail, to allow inmates to leave the correctional facility with more effective means of dealing with their problems so we don't see them in jail again as repeat offenders. Some just need that extra support to get straightened out.

I need to focus on keeping the hiring and retention policy in good working order, and further, make sure that employees are helpful, professional, courteous, and caring in their dealings with each other and with citizens.

I need to also focus on the development of more programs that work in cooperation with citizens, which will become easier with the two new deputy positions.

The above are just a few things that I can see the need to focus on in the immediate future. However, there are a number of issues that come up daily that also require their due attention, and my focus will continually adjust as necessary to ensure that our department runs smoothly and effectively.

In closing, I would like to add that we aren't perfect. Despite the fact that we are indeed human and do make mistakes, I am proud of the way that the Elmore County Sheriff's Department has worked as a cooperative, interdependent entity to serve and hopefully will continue to serve our citizens.

Greg Berry

Ind. -- challenger

Please describe your philosophy of law enforcement and management of the sheriff office.

As it always must be, law enforcement officers are bound to protect the community. Ethics and professionalism have always been the critical importance to the community. Law enforcement is a profession with explicit public trust as its foundation.

To achieve the quality of services needed for the people, deputies depend on the actions of each individual of the department to get through the day. There cannot be any doubt of team cooperation.

We are in the "people business," it is important that we act in a moral and ethical manner at every level of the sheriff's organization, as well as at the political level. It has traditionally been a pedestal profession leaving all of us living in glass houses.

If elected, I will energize and invigorate my team to excel at every responsibility and earn your trust as we are "serving you."

What do you believe are the strengths of the sheriffs department?

The strong points of every organization are its employees. There are several departments and branches of the Sheriffs Office: Patrol, Dispatch, Jail, Civil, Drivers License/Administration, Search and Rescue, Extrication, COPS, to name a few. They are the strength that builds the foundation for the success of the sheriff's department.

Unfortunately, there are an alarming number of experienced and dedicated deputies that have left and more continue to leave the sheriff's office.

I have spoken with some deputies and have learned they are disillusioned with the inadequate leadership of our sheriff. We must stop this loss and address the problems with new leadership.

Elmore County has a great experience investment in these fine people. Replacing the deputies takes months and even years to achieve the quality of professionalism and skill that we have lost.

If elected, I will work to get the morale back on track through fair treatment and compensation, training, with an ambitious team building leadership approach.

What do you believe are the weaknesses of the sheriff department (if any) and, if you believe there are weaknesses, how do you propose to correct them?

Under the current leadership there is a serious morale problem. Issues have developed that are affecting the lives of our deputies and their ability to contribute the highest quality of services that our community deserves.

These issues came from a lack of involvement from the sheriff on law enforcement training, insufficient help AND inadequate compensation.

During the last 20 years written policies and procedures have been remiss for the department. This management failure has caused inconsistencies which are understandably interpreted as unfair and frustrating to our law enforcement team.

Not having a clear sense of direction puts the deputies in a situation where they believe their necks are sticking out to disciplinary action and public condemnation.

If elected, my immediate goal is to establish those written policies. Those policies will be based in law, guidance from the Idaho Sheriff's Organization and experienced department leadership.

The deputies will know there is someone that will look into their issues and be quick to respond to any matter important to them and the community.

Refresher training will be implemented so that your law enforcement team is on the same page and fully skilled in all matters of their occupation.

I will perform a top to bottom review of the budget to ensure your tax dollars are being spent wisely and I will develop a comprehensive budget addressing the most vital needs of the department. I am fully aware that fiscal responsibility is always important, and with that in mind I promise to be a steward of public trust and funds.

Where do you believe the sheriff's office should focus its attention?

Public Safety! The number one mission is to take care of the people of Elmore County. To get there, as stated in the previous questions, I believe focus should be on improving leadership, morale among the deputies, as well as extensive training to better prepare all department employees for any situation put upon them in the line of duty.

(When referring to "deputies," I am addressing all positions in the sheriff's department.)

Also, with the economy faltering and Idaho's unemployment doubling during the last eight months we need to be prepared and better trained for an increase in crimes such as robbery, burglary, drug activity and domestic violence.

When our law enforcement team is better schooled, with clear guidelines, and they have what's needed in equipment, they will excel in any emergency or other adverse situation.

Our deputies will not only become much better defenders of the public, but also public relations ambassadors our community will look up to and appreciate.

Robin Ellis

GOP -- challenger

No response was received from the candidate by deadline.

Comments
View 16 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Greg Berry has my vote. Rick Layher won't change anything and is too set in his ways. He won't admit that what Greg has said is true. Talk to the officers, there is no chain of command, no support from the current Sheriff, no policy and procedures to follow, no leadership or morale amongst the troops because of Rick.

    -- Posted by WhatUknow on Wed, Oct 29, 2008, at 11:11 AM
  • Finally! The candidates were able to get their messages out there. And I guess we can see how important this election is to Mr. Ellis. I know he means well and wants a change, but I don't believe he really has a plan if he did win. Mr. Layher is a fine speaker but his words are hollow when you realize he's had over 20 years to accomplish what he is just now trying to do! It seems like every four years Mr. Layher talks big and after the election, he goes back to "business as usual". Greg Berry is the obvious choice. Experience, desire, ethics and a genuine love of law enforcement. He has a plan to help unite the department and try to repair the issues with public trust. How many more deputies need to quit to demonstrate the need for new leadership. Get out and vote!

    -- Posted by newbie5 on Wed, Oct 29, 2008, at 12:33 PM
  • I have to agree that Greg Berry is the only choice. Our community needs an invigorated leader in the sheriff's department to boost morale and achieve a strong sense of direction. We will all benefit if Berry is elected!

    -- Posted by Fairplay on Wed, Oct 29, 2008, at 4:58 PM
  • Rick Layher's philosophy has not worked for years. He is too far behind the times and too entrenched in the local politics.

    Rick Layher wants another chance to fix the weaknesses of HIS agency. Trouble is, he is the one who created the problems in the first place. He's had over 20 years to make things work. Hasn't happened yet, what's different now?

    Staff are leaving in droves. Why? No department policies exist. Why? One deputy on duty to cover the whole county. Why? Inability to make a convincing (prosecutable) case on serious crimes. Why? Manhours and equipment (dollars) wasted on look-good projects while public safety is neglected. Why?

    Rick Layher has had his chance. Now its too late. Things are beyond his ability. It is time for new blood.

    Greg Berry has experience, integrity, a fresh perspective, a passion for service, and an eye toward the future. Time for a change.

    -- Posted by waders on Wed, Oct 29, 2008, at 9:59 PM
  • Rick Layher didn't write his responses. I have never heard him on TV or seen any of his writings in other interviews with the words used in his answers to this questionair.

    -- Posted by WhatUknow on Thu, Oct 30, 2008, at 12:58 PM
  • I admire the research and effort I have seen Greg Berry putting into this election. He's been avaiable to answer questions and has plans to implement the improvements he's mentioned not just grandios ideals.

    -- Posted by idgirl on Fri, Oct 31, 2008, at 5:21 AM
  • Amen -- we're for Greg Berry as well! And for all the reasons above.

    -- Posted by senior lady on Fri, Oct 31, 2008, at 10:56 AM
  • Kudos to Greg Berry!!! Its about time we hear some truth and honesty. He has my vote and always has!

    -- Posted by bc on Fri, Oct 31, 2008, at 1:50 PM
  • *

    WhatUknow is absolutely correct that Rick Layher did not write "his response". I have heard Rick speak many times and he sounds a whole lot more like one of the hillbillies in Deliverance than the person who wrote the answers to these questions. My guess is that it was either his second wife Bobbi or his "thinking brain dog" Tom Berry who wrote this stuff! If Rick is really serious about showing us that he deserves another term I suggest that he TRUTHFULLY ANSWER the questions that were posted on the Banter Box several weeks ago and "conveniently removed" by the MHN!

    -- Posted by Charlemagne on Fri, Oct 31, 2008, at 9:19 PM
  • I realize that everyone has there opinions about who they think is right for the job. Rick Layher has done a wonderful job over the years he has always been there when I needed help or had questions. He is a very truthful and honest person. Charlemagne and WhatUknow the comment that you made Rick Layher did not write "his response". I would like to know where you find out this information out and just why you would think someone would not write their own answer and why exactly do you care. One question to you is Have you been to the recent debates to hear both Greg and Rick talk?

    I feel that Rick is best for the job, we need someone who knows how to do the job right, and who has the experience and qualification needed to handle a very stressful job.

    My vote is definetly for Rick he has done a great job in this county and will continue to once he wins this election.

    And to everyone else I respect your opinions but why go as low as a childish human being to make comments like, "My guess is that it was either his second wife Bobbi or his "thinking brain dog" Tom Berry." Come on.... Oh and by the way sometimes a fresh new face always isn't the right person for the job.

    -- Posted by truthful on Fri, Oct 31, 2008, at 10:54 PM
  • *

    Truthful, did you see the questions for Rick that were posted on the Banter Box several weeks ago? If even a few of the things that they suggest about Rick are true he has absolutely no business being our Sheriff. I don't claim to know all the answers myself but I have talked with a number of people who have seen Rick childishly lose his temper at other people who were just doing their jobs, put his own "political" interests above those of the people and County and show favoritism. Rick has acted as if the office of Sheriff is a title of nobility he has some sort of "Divine Right" to instead of a trust that he holds from the people. My work schedule has not allowed me to go to any of the debates but I know all three candidates and have heard them all speak many times. I am not saying that I don't have some reservations about Greg Berry I do; but Greg is a veritable Teddy Roosevelt or Ronald Reagan compared to Rick!

    -- Posted by Charlemagne on Sat, Nov 1, 2008, at 9:40 PM
  • Mountain Home has grown, that is a fact, Changes are good when morales and ethics are enforced.

    Public needs to be aware of the facts, not just what is told to a newpaper to make it sound good.

    The public has the right to know what is going on, and when things get swept under the rug, just to make it sound better, that is wrong. I do not believe that the public's safety is respected. I have read about public issues, that were printed and the actual or the real facts to the matter was not all factual and most just down right untrue but some might say it was to protect us from the real truth or it was told that way for us to believe that it was the full truth and how the events really happened. I think it is time that we get the real facts and if having new officals elected will accomplish that, then I vote for change, When the citizens voted in the term limits, We were told that we did not know what we were voting for, so the legislation voted out what the citizens voted in only to save their jobs, as if the term limits was in effect then we would not be having long term issues with long term good ole boy attitudes that do not change when changes are needed. We do need a change and we need to trust our law enforcement, and trust in our Elected officials but when the same over and over rumors and information is given that smells fishy, then something just might be fishy, there has been to many rumors about unethical methods and unethical practices, and I do not believe all of them are just rumors, as if you hear one or two or maybe three then maybe they are just rumors but when you hear, the same ones over and over year after year then I start to question it, and I believe there may be a problem. Mountain Home deserves to have strong and ethical and responsible people to serve and protect us and represent us not just give us what they think we need to just pease us.

    -- Posted by Nanna of 3 on Sat, Nov 1, 2008, at 9:53 PM
  • Yes, Rick has done a good job, however, it is time for a change. To many questions and conerns have been brought up time and time again about his integrity and ethics. Some may be true and some may be not. I begin to wonder about these comments because every time someone wrote a bad comment or statement about him or his captain on the other blog, somehow it got deleted?? Is this good or bad?

    -- Posted by melkenoo on Sat, Nov 1, 2008, at 11:17 PM
  • Melkenoo you have hit the nail right on the head when questions and comments are removed it just makes whole process look corrupt. I have said it before removing legitimate questions about Rick's competence and ethics does not change anything. It does not make Rick any smarter or any more moral. It merely confirms that his character and conduct are such that they cannot stand the light of day. If the guy had nothing to hide, then why are things censored? Finally the MHN needs to remember that doing this sort of thing makes both them and Rick Layher look worse!

    -- Posted by Moltus on Sun, Nov 2, 2008, at 8:54 PM
  • I have known and observed Sheriff Rick Layher for many years. I have also worked with him on occasion from time to time. So I have had an opportunity to draw a number of conclusions about him as both a man and as our Sheriff. Rick does not have what it takes intellectually, emotionally or morally to be a good Sheriff. In addition I have read the comments of many of my fellow citizens detailing their own problems and sources of dissatisfaction with the guy. While these people don't know everything about the Sheriff that I do; their complaints are strong evidence this is not just a personal thing between me and Rick. If he is re-elected we will almost certainly have more of the same poor performance from our Sheriff.

    -- Posted by Perry Mason on Mon, Nov 3, 2008, at 11:22 AM
  • Greg Berry. Period.

    -- Posted by outtathere on Mon, Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: