School bond would upgrade vo-tech

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Gone are the days where high school vo-tech classes consisted of auto or wood shop alone.

Today's high school students have a variety of options to choose from and if voters approve the Mountain Home School District's $37.5 million bond on April 29, those options will be available to more Mountain Home High School students.

The high school's professional technical program, the term preferred over vo-tech or vocational technical, consists of automotive mechanics, industrial mechanics, carpentry, video productions and editing, drafting classes, health occupations and professional applications.

The school district feels those classes are important because they teach students skills to be successful out of high school.

"It's very important because not every kid wants to go to college," Superintedent Tim McMutrey said. "We try to provide a well-orientated education."

Auto mechanics instructor Lynn Knudson is quick to point out students that do go on to college or other post-secondary schools can use skills learned from the professional technical program to work while in school.

He feels professional technical programs not only help students stay in school, but also keeps them focused in other classes.

"Student's aren't just interested in government and English, but they will take these classes and pass them if they know they need them to take advanced (professional technical) classes," Knudson said.

With limited space in advanced professional technical classes, teachers often look at a student's overall grades before accepting them into an advanced class.

Despite the advantages of having a professional technical program, the biggest limitation to students isn't the options available, it's the space available for students to participate in classes already offered.

Due to limited classroom space, not all students are able to enroll in the professional technical classes and classrooms are crowded with students and equipment.

The bond, as part of the Phase II plan to complete the junior high as a high school, includes plans to turn the current district maintenance compound area into a professional technical program center, which would nearly double the size of the current building.

Maintenance would most likely move into the auto shop and the rest of the annex would be used for junior high classrooms.

"The plan is not to go down and tear down buildings that could be used by the district," Knudson said.

With more space, and additional teachers, students would be able to maximize their experience in the professional technical programs. Not only would more students be able to enroll in the classes, they would learn more in class, he believes.

Knudson said the increased space would give his students more opportunity to do more live work since his biggest challenge is finding enough room to set up equipment and demo procedures before students can work on their own.

Because of the space limitation, his Auto 1 and 2 classes are limited in the amount of live work they can do.

Doug Root, the carpentry, drafting and video production and editing instructor, said his carpentry class is limited to 65 students. He said the class could expand to 120 students if there was more room.

He would also like to see his advanced classes expanded into longer periods because a large part of class time is spent traveling to and from the job sites. Additional instructors would make that a possibility.

Root's classes focus mainly on carpentry with a little bit of time spent on cabinetry. He said if the bond passes, he could offer carpentry and cabinetry with the bigger shop.

"Students would be well rounded when they come out with skill in carpentry and cabinetry," Root said.

The additional space isn't just a luxury, it's a necessity in some of the classrooms as equipment and work spaces are crammed together, district officials believe.

Nowhere is that more evident then the school's industrial mechanic class, more commonly referred to as welding, where welding equipment and work spaces seem to overlap, causing potential safety issues.

Industrial mechanic instructor Larry Mulalley said he has an average of 22 students a class period, which causes cramped quarters.

"A less cramped environment would be less of a safety risk," he said.

In Root's drafting class, there appears to be plenty of room in the computer lab where he holds class. What there isn't enough of in the computer lab are teachers, as Root is forced to hold three drafting courses in one class period so that other classes can be held in the same room and he can teach additional classes throughout the day.

The drafting program also would benefit from the increased space because the space would give students the room to use the large desk to learn how to draft plans manually.

Root's drafting class isn't the only time he teaches more than one class at a time. He also teaches video production and advanced editing in one class.

The same plan that would nearly double the professional technical programs center also means the professional technical programs would be available to freshman, since the Phase II plan calls for moving the 9th-grade classes into the high school.

"If they find something they are interested in in ninth grade, they are less likely to drop out," Johnson said. "If you give a kid a reason to say, 'wow, this is cool,' and a reason to come to school, hopefully they are less likely to drop out."

Knudson said the school is looking into a freshman exploratory program where students would be exposed to auto and industrial mechanics, construction and possibly electrical science. "This gives students the opportunity to figure out the path they want to take," Knudson said.

The goal of the professional technical program, according to Knudson is to train as many students as possible that want to take professional technical classes and to stop pushing students away those that want to participate in them, as the district is forced to do at present.

Comments
View 8 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    While I understand the importance of some of the areas covered in this article, the question still remains as to why or when is the school board going to hold an open forum on this issue? They should listen to some of the concerns of the community such as those voiced here. Not only should the school board but city and county officials need to hear our words about the taxes we are already paying. It is time to wake up and smell the coffee board members.

    -- Posted by B Mullen on Sun, Mar 23, 2008, at 9:24 PM
  • Im voting "NO" on the Bond

    -- Posted by Freedom on Mon, Mar 24, 2008, at 8:14 AM
  • I also think they should have the bond vote at normal polling places. We don't vote at the schools - we have always had our normal polling spots. Mine is at a church.

    The schools influenced the votes last time. They voted on a parent teacher conference night at the schools.

    Little biased don't you think?

    As a matter of fact - maybe that should be looked into. If you want to influence votes for other things/ie gov't votes, you have to be a certain distance away from the polling place. The district is influencing the votes - and right on the voting place.

    How is that legally done? Anyone know? Anyone care to check this out?

    -- Posted by midea on Mon, Mar 24, 2008, at 10:18 AM
  • I plan on a NO vote also; if they'd try something more modest (especially in a RECESSION) they might get a YES out of me; but what about the tax money we ALREADY GIVE? Why isn't that any good?

    I pay dearly for my child's private education, where God has not been legisltated out of the classroom. There's no limo service there either, like the PS's; so in essence, I pay twice.

    I see what they operate on (great education for a very modest charge) in the private schools, but the government indoctrination camps are already VERY expensive per pupil. They can do better!!!

    Try a bond under 10 Million and I'll listen. We're not a major city here, 37M is a huge burden for a town of 12K people!

    -- Posted by RAM on Mon, Mar 24, 2008, at 5:36 PM
  • Looks like we need more readin,writin, and arithmetic than we do a votec. Look at the following article in the Idaho Statesman today.

    You can get paper on line. Look under dropdown menu "NEWS". Then "Local News". The article title is:

    "Is your kid's school in crosshairs of No Child Left Behind?"

    Mountain Home schools didn't do so well - failed five years in a row!!!!!

    Looks like we need the BASICS in educaton right now - forget the fancy.

    -- Posted by midea on Mon, Mar 24, 2008, at 7:04 PM
  • You know I left a few comments on the open forum concerning this topic. See it is my understanding that the "School District" proposed a school bond to build the High School already, isn't that why the JR. High has that nice building? So what happened the first time? Why did the "New High School" end up being the Jr. High?

    -- Posted by Missylynn on Tue, Mar 25, 2008, at 4:07 PM
  • Missylynn:

    It was my and MANY, MANY individuals understanding from reading the papers and talking with people,that we were getting a High School. In fact my youngest son would have gone to the new HIGHS SCHOOL. We were all excited. There was a sign for a long time on the property while it was being built, saying future home of Mtn Home High School. Friends/acquaintances I knew or still know of (including people who worked or are still working for the school)understood that this was going to be opened as a high school. We all were excited.

    Needless to say - that didn't happen. Instead - they opened it as a Jr. High.

    Why would we be asked for a bond to build a high school- build it - THEN open it as a Jr High - AND THEN -ask for MORE money -to work on it to become a high school? Make any sense to you?

    When you ask the public for a bond to build a high school - then when you open it -shouldn't it be a high school right from the beginning? Take it from there -

    I would encourage you to read the blog on the Main page - go down to the bottom of those blogs and I believe you click on "read all comments" to go back to the beginning - and you will be more educated as to what is or isn't true. There are some references within those blogs that you can also use to help you make a decision about the bond. It does make for a long read - but, there are some points worth knowing.

    Don't know if this helps or not. But, I hope it does.

    -- Posted by midea on Tue, Mar 25, 2008, at 9:35 PM
  • midea,

    It has always troubled me that many in Mountain Home seemed unaware at the time of the original bond that the plan all along was for a phased series of bonds to build the eventual High School.

    Let's go back a little further than the originally passed bond. Many attempts to build a new high school were made in the years prior to the bond that was finally approved. At that time, it was made clear (to me at least) that the phased approach was the district's attempt to finally get the ball rolling...so to speak. I knew from the outset...through the initial discussions in the media, as well as in the text of the bond itself...that the approved was to be phase 1 of the high school project. I have never understood how so many others felt confused or duped by the district. Did not everyone read the text of the bond before casting their vote? Isn't that the individual voters' chief responsibility?

    That said, even IF the district failed to adequately communicate the full scope of the project plan (and I still contend that they did so), isn't it time to set aside the feelings of disillusionment and move forward? I say it is...what do you say?

    -- Posted by rjs on Fri, Mar 28, 2008, at 2:39 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: