City, county review economic strategy

Thursday, May 8, 2014

City and county officials met recently in hopes of ironing out a strategy aimed at fostering economic growth around the Mountain Home area.

Paula Riggs, who heads the city's economic development office, organized the April 21 meeting to identify what the city and county need to draw new businesses and industries to this part of the state.

While Mountain Home and Elmore County want those companies to come here, "right now, we're not ready," Riggs said.

Something needs to be in place, "even if it's just baby steps," she added.

A report released by the Boise Valley Economic Partnership showed a list of 40 businesses looking to expand in the Treasure Valley and southern Idaho in recent years. Of those requests, Mountain Home was only qualified to submit proposals to 11 of those companies.

During the meeting, the economic development director highlighted other examples where the city lost out in bids to bring those types of companies here.

For example, a fructose fruit processing plant looked specifically at Mountain Home to open a new factory. However, since the city lacked a water treatment facility, the company ended up going to Rupert, which already had that asset in place.

A data call center, which at one time also looked at Mountain Home, went elsewhere since the city lacked the needed electrical infrastructure to support its energy requirements, Riggs said.

If needed infrastructure is not already in place, companies will move on and not wait because, "they have a million other choices in other cities and states," she added.

Mountain Home and other communities in the county also lack other requirements that businesses and industries need if they plan to move to a certain area. Over the past 10 years, a skilled workforce remained at the top of this list.

"The number one thing that companies want to know about and look for before they choose a place to go is an educated, talented work force," Riggs said.

It's one requirement that has turned companies away from Mountain Home, she added. For example, a Oregon-based company that specializes in large-scale woodworking projects looked at coming here with plans to hire high school students with woodworking skills.

However, the city lost out due to state-level cuts in school funding that forced the high school to shut down its woodworking program and eliminated that potential workforce.

Riggs highlighted some steps the city is taking to remedy the workforce dilemma. Among them is a newly formed education work force development committee headed by the chamber of commerce.

In addition to developing a high quality work force, the committee is seeking to give local workers "the skills to be successful for themselves and our economy in the future," said Ted Thompson, who chairs this committee.

But workers are just part of the list of needs companies require if they plan to expand their reach into different communities. In addition to shovel-ready land, they often want an existing large-scale buildings, which Mountain Home and the county also lack, according to Riggs.

In recent years, the city received requests from companies looking for warehouses spanning 200,000 square feet as well as workers with engineering backgrounds, both of which the city lacks.

Simply put, companies don't want to wait three months to have a warehouse built or have an piece of land rezoned to meet their needs. They want these assets in place right away, Riggs said.

During their discussions, Councilman Geoff Schroeder suggested that the city and county work together and create a database featuring detailed information on commercial and industrial areas in and around the Mountain Home area. He suggested that it include zoning and ready-to-use status of these properties and whether buildings and land were available for sale, lease or rent.

The goal was to have all this information compiled and ready to present to any company interested in coming to this part of the state, Schroeder said.

Another idea presented during the meeting was creating an industrial development profile matrix similar to one currently used by Oregon's economic and community development department. The chart lists various types of companies and industries and their specific requirements, including the physical site and utility requirements to transportation and telecommunications needs.

Mountain Home Public Works Director Wayne Shepherd aired concerns with this type of one-size-fits-all approach. He emphasized that a food processing plant located on one side of Mountain Home would have different zoning and utility issues than a similar plant proposed on the other side of town.

Other topics raised at last week's meeting looked at assets within the city and county and whether they can help encourage businesses to come here. Among these assets is an unused rail line that runs around the former city landfill and airport out to Mountain Home Air Force Base.

While currently owned by the Army Corps of Engineers, military officials indicated their willingness to lease the rail line at no cost to the city, Riggs said. In return, the city would pay to maintain and inspect that line.

Gaining access to that rail line could give the city and county an advantage during a company's decision-making process. In addition, it would greatly benefit current plans to convert the area around this existing rail line into a new industrial zone on the west side of Mountain Home, she said.

While city and county officials favored the idea of moving forward with this plan, questions were aired on whether the city and county would shoulder the burden of those maintenance costs. Meanwhile, Commissioner Al Hofer asked whether companies like Simplot would be willing to help absorb some of these costs.

At the same time, Schroeder added that companies looking at moving to southern Idaho may not be aware of the potential for the city and county to gain access to that rail line. He urged those at the meeting to go ahead with acquiring the line and marketing its availability to potential businesses and industries, who may be willing to help offset those costs to repair and maintain it.

In addition to these types of resources, there are other incentives that could encourage companies to come to Idaho or expand what they already have here. Among them is a new tax incentive approved by the state legislature aimed at benefitting companies that hire a minimum of 20 workers or increase their existing workforce by at least that number.

While these companies would still pay their taxes, the state would then reimburse them if they meet the new hiring criteria, according to Riggs.

Meanwhile, Councilman Russ Anderson asked whether it was feasible to offer other incentives as part of this economic development plan. For example, he suggested looking at ways to encourage smaller businesses to fill the empty store fronts in the Mountain Home's downtown area.

With companies wanting buildings already in place, those at the meeting asked whether the city and county should consider building warehouses and other facilities in prime locations in currently zoned areas. While Riggs highlighted there were three local companies already willing to build facilities to suit specific needs, having the city or county build generic facilities for potential clients came with a number of inherent risks.

"Is it 'build it and they will come' or will it be 'build it and it's not right,' " Riggs asked.

Hofer agreed with that perspective, adding that if something sits unoccupied or unused for too long, it becomes the proverbial "bridge to nowhere."

That becomes a tough sell to the local community, he said.

However, there were other ways the city and county can stay ahead of the power curve when dealing with commercial and industrial growth. Bonnie Harper, the county's economic development coordinator, highlighted a recent study on the Highway 20 corridor north of Mountain Home.

Information contained in that study not only pinpointed which land in this area was ready to "come on line," it included details on what the city needed to deal with this type of growth, including the location of needed traffic lights and other improvements along this highway.

A similar study could help address similar growth in other parts of the county, including the Simco Road area, the interstate corridor between Mountain Home and Hammett as well as road leading to Pine and Featherville.

While the city and county would love to bring in a business with 700 workers, it's currently not feasible, said Councilman Richard Urquidi. There's no way the city could invest millions of dollars into making needed improvements in hopes of attracting something like a large-scale food processing plant.

"We need to look for the 'little fish' right now. The big fish will come later," Urquidi said.

However, he added that the city and county should still keep their options open when opportunities like Marathon Cheese present themselves.

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • it woudl be nice to see other companies come to Mountain Home. But like the articel stated, the lack of buildings, electric etc. are our biggest downfall. The part that amused me the most was when they talked about the small busines buildings that are not being utilitzed right now. It is difficult in this town to rent one of these buildings or spaces when the owners are charging outrageous prices for rent. When the rent only takes over half if not more of your income, people are not able to afford that which in turn makes them shut the doors. How many spaces are open right now in this town? Way too many. We have had opportunities to have big companies come to Mountain Home only to be turned away. Cabelas is just one of those companies. How many jobs could have been available if Cabelas would have been here, right off the interstate. Lots. But here we sit. People talk about wanting Mountain Home to grow, but all I seem to hear are excuses why we can't or why they can't come. Yes it takes time, but I have lived here for over 20 years, and the only busines that has stayed is Wal Mart. Time to step up city and county. Your people expect you to help, but seems to me there are people in this town that don't want the competition. Just my opionion...

    -- Posted by robinhood1 on Thu, May 8, 2014, at 8:55 AM
  • It's really not that complicated. If you are trying to attract some sort of manufacturing co., your city/county should be able to promise:

    1. Abundant inexpensive water supply.

    2. A good location. Easy access on and off freeway. Rail line???? Don't waste your money there.

    3. Adequate infrastructure. Power, sewer.

    4. Inexpensive property, and some sort of tax break to follow for some period of time.

    5. Qualified contractors for some sort of build to suit situation.

    6. Investors that would back some sort of build to suit situation.

    7. Adequate numbers of qualified labor force within the pay scale they are looking to pay.

    8. Upper end companies with more skilled labor will be looking at our schools. Academics etc. For companies such as Marathon Cheese (un-skilled labor), it may not be as important.

    Pay attention to these criteria, and you have it.

    Marathon Cheese. That pretty much paints the picture for what brought them here.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Fri, May 9, 2014, at 7:56 AM
  • I forgot affordable housing. No problem there.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Fri, May 9, 2014, at 9:02 AM
  • Just to be clear...we need to build warehouses in the hopes that some company may want to move their business here and make use of them; is that correct?

    -- Posted by GetRealNow on Fri, May 9, 2014, at 11:39 AM
  • That's what they are saying, but I think have resources in place to construct a design type build to meet their needs if they do decide to move here. Whether they build to own or investors have it built to rent to them. You have to already have an infrastructure in place though.

    When there is a lot of competition from other towns and counties, you have to offer things they cannot, or will not. Sometimes the returns are not immediate, but more like an investment in Mountain Homes future. Like most investments you have fund the front end.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Fri, May 9, 2014, at 12:12 PM
  • The economic development positions of the county and city have been a waste of taxpayer dollars for over 20 years. What have they done?

    They talk a good game to keep their jobs but have a million excuses for negative results.

    What do they do that the local Chamber could not do?

    -- Posted by gmoney on Wed, May 14, 2014, at 7:11 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: