District asks for renewal of supplemental levy

Thursday, February 20, 2014

The Mountain Home School District is asking voters to renew the current supplemental levy when they go to the polls in a special election on March 11.

The levy would be good for two years and raise $2.7 million a year to maintain the existing "status quo" of the school district's programs.

The district is not offering doom and gloom projections if it doesn't pass. "We think people understand how important this is," said Superintendent Tim McMurtrey.

"This is just what you have to do to run a school," said Assistant Superintendent James Gilbert.

In 2008 and 2009, when the legislature drastically cut public school funding, the district had been forced at that time to not only pass a supplemental levy, but to still slash teaching positions and programs to stay within its financial means.

Since then, however, the district has managed to find equilibrium at the reduced levels. "We've still had to cut a few things over the last few years," McMurtrey said. "For example, we reduced the PE and music programs in the elementary schools. We didn't cut the programs, but we have fewer teachers running those programs now."

Both the administration and the overall staffing of the district are actually about 7 percent below what the state recommends and student-to-teacher ratios are much higher than the district's officials ever thought they would see, but they've learned to adjust. Administrators still have to take furlough days and the full number of contract days for staff hasn't been completely restored, but the number of days students are being taught are back up to the full 180-day level it was at before the crisis hit almost five years ago.

And that's occurred even with the district facing a shortfall of nearly a million dollars in anticipated federal funds, from Impact Aid and other sources, that were cut during sequester or which have been otherwise withheld by Congress.

Yet the district is proud of what it has been able to accomplish.

Its 96 percent graduation rate is one of the best in the SIC and nearly half, 46 percent, of its students go on to four-year colleges. Another 34 percent seek some other form of advanced schooling or training.

Students so far this year have earned 168 college credits through partnerships with BSU, CSI, CWI and NNU for advanced classes offered at the high school.

The speech and debate team is nationally recognized and the drama program is led by the reigning Drama Teacher of the Year for the state.

The district has been able to maintain a robust program of elective classes and extra-curricular activities for the students.

"We think we've done pretty well with what we've been given to work with," McMurtrey said. "In the end, we are going to teach these kids, no matter what."

The levy being proposed March 11 will represent about 13 percent of the district's expenses for student programs and activities, transportation costs and salaries and benefits for staff, among other expenses.

It also helps maintain buildings and grounds (the average age of a school building in the district is 46 years and some are approaching the century mark), and covers the cost of federally mandated programs such as special education that have been underfunded by Congress.

Asking for a supplemental levy isn't unique to this district. Since the state funding shortfalls began, 94 of the 115 districts in the state either currently have a levy in place or are, like Mountain Home, asking for one this spring.

If it doesn't pass, McMurtrey said, "it's 13 percent of our budget, and we'll cut accordingly." But he's not digging into his black book of nuclear options, yet.

"We have faith in the patrons of this district. This is something they've already seen the need for and approved. We're simply asking that it be renewed. Taxes will not go up."

Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    One word: BUDGET. All we seem to hear from mhsd is we need more money but what are they doing with the millions they receive?

    -- Posted by B Mullen on Thu, Feb 20, 2014, at 6:31 AM
  • "Nuclear options." Spare the public, please.

    Taxes will not go up---well, yes they will because you yahoos took over 400,000 in an "Emergency Levy" in 2013 in ADDITION to the one you are asking for now. So to say that taxes will not go up is yet another MHSD lie.

    You guys are really something.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Thu, Feb 20, 2014, at 7:22 AM
  • Would my taxes be less if the levy does not pass? Yes, is the correct answer. To say that my taxes will not go up is an outright lie. It would be proper to say that taxes will not increase from the current level.

    -- Posted by jtrotter on Thu, Feb 20, 2014, at 8:59 AM
  • The town I grew up in wasn't much bigger than Mountain Home and we saw the same thing happen with our school budgets. Each year the district continued to ask for more and more money until the voters finally got fed up and turned down the budget. It went to multiple votes as the district continued to crank up the rhetoric about all the drastic effects an "austerity" budget would have on the schools. Sports and various other extra-circulars would no longer be supported, there wouldn't be enough textbooks, the list went on and on. The voters still voted the budget down and forced the schools into an austerity budget.

    Guess what? None of those horrible predictions came to fruition, there were still sports, extra-circulars and textbooks as before. As far as the students, parents and the rest of the town could tell nothing changed during the austerity period (except that a lot of the fat got trimmed away from the school budget and everyone payed less school taxes). The follow-on budgets fell in line with the supposed "austerity" plan baseline since the school district's claims had been proven untrue. It might be time for the same thing to happen here.

    -- Posted by Northside on Thu, Feb 20, 2014, at 10:13 PM
  • It's SO clear that this district needs financial help. Not in the form of an extended levy, but professional help in operating a 25+ million dollar a year budget. To much "I don't know, but???" going on here. How can you with a straight face in the front of taxpayers say that your property taxes will not go up. Are they just hoping that there are enough folks that do not realize that if the levy fails they will be going down. Trying to follow the districts reasoning is like trying to figure out where the pretzel started, and where it ends.

    -- Posted by dudewheresmycar on Mon, Feb 24, 2014, at 3:18 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: