WECRD to launch capital campaign

Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Mark Hiddleston addressed the public last week at the YMCA town hall meeting. Photo by Brian S. Orban

Following months of studies and research, the Mountain Home community is set to enter the next phase of a long-term effort to build a community recreation center here.

With three years to go before its doors are due to open, representatives with the Treasure Valley YMCA outlined the initiative's future steps during a town hall meeting Feb. 22.

"We are at a transition stage in the process," said David Duro, operations chief with the Treasure Valley YMCA. The organization remains under contract with the Western Elmore County Recreation District to explore the possibility of building a YMCA-run facility here.

Comprehensive surveys and revenue studies over the past 18 months illustrated the public's support for this facility, he said. Additional research lead to a decision last November to pursue the construction of a community recreation complex that included an indoor track, regulation-size gymnasium and indoor aquatics center.

The next challenge begins in coming weeks as community representatives meet to explore ways to raise the additional money to get this facility built. Critical to the success of this effort, the capital campaign seeks to raise at least $900,000 to tie into a cash reserve maintained by the Mountain Home-based recreation district.

This money "gets us started," said Mark Hiddleston, who will co-chair the capital campaign feasibility committee. Anything above that amount will either speed up this construction process or help ease the tax burden on the local community, he added.

According to a timeline presented at last week's town hall meeting, the actual capital campaign begins in August with this effort expected to wrap up by October 2012.

Money raised during that effort would only cover the initial portion of what will likely become a multi-phase project, Hiddleston said. That initial step would include a community recreation center featuring an indoor track, free weight and cardiovascular fitness rooms, teen center and youth activities area.

Building the entire complex at once won't work here due to the significant up-front costs, which is why the plan involves building it in stages, Duro said. This gives the community the ability to control the future direction of the final facility, which could include accelerating those plans if support for this facility gains momentum.

"While we'd love to build it all at once, the reality is that we'll have to build it in stages," Hiddleston said. The goal is to develop an affordable facility without incurring long-term debt.

The capital campaign and later steps represent a marathon "with exit ramps all the way," said Jim Everett, chief executive officer with the Treasure Valley YMCA. "We may find out that the money is not out there."

In short, Mountain Home's community recreation center dream could end if this capital campaign fails, Everett said.

"Until ground is broken, we still have the option to pull back and not proceed," Hiddleston added. However, information from previous community surveys indicate this project will remain a workable, self-sustaining and viable community "anchor" -- a place where everyone can gather.

But even if Mountain Home raises the money needed to get this initial facility built, it still needs subsidies and monthly membership fees to keep it running, according to Duro. Information collected during a market study last year puts that number at $77,000 with the WECRD paying those subsidies. However, this amount is based on "very conservative estimates" and could come out less than expected, he added.

Meanwhile, those needed subsidies would jump significantly if the recreation center moves forward to build the gymnasium and pool complex. Even with a 60 percent increase in monthly membership fees, the center would need about $218,000 from the recreation district to cover its overhead, Duro said.

The town hall meeting also gave the Treasure Valley based organization a chance to highlight the final results of a formal marketing survey targeting the local public. Overall, 74 percent of those polled supported the construction of a community recreation center with 10 percent showing their opposition, said Steven Dean, a representative with Strategic Research Associates, which conducted the study.

Support remained strongest in younger families in the Mountain Home area with a similar level of support among households with children up to 18 years old. Meanwhile, more than half of respondents said they would definitely or likely join a YMCA with an indoor aquatic center, even if it meant paying more for a monthly membership.

In comparison, support for a basic community recreation center with lower membership fees hovered around 44 percent with public backing for a recreation center and gymnasium dropping to 37 percent.

In addition, the facility's proposed location adjacent to Mountain Home Junior High School played a significant role in garnering local support, Dean said. More than half of those polled were far more likely to use this type of recreation center if they could get there within five minutes. That level of support dropped the farther away people lived from the planned facility.

Dean emphasized that the survey results are based on "very conservative" averages and takes into account personal biases and impulsive or "feel good" figures of those responding to these polls.

"People typically overestimate when they respond" to these surveys, and the final results take this into account, he added.

Looking at the other results, Dean said those who remain opposed to the recreation center concept continue to question the feasibility of running this type of facility while others argue against using tax dollars to subsidize the community complex.

Of the nearly two dozen people attending the town hall meeting, a few spoke in support of this initiative. An unidentified woman considered a YMCA with a pool "the best thing for senior citizens" in this community.

A handful of others were harshly critical. Brandon Stahl accused the WECRD of "raping and pillaging" the taxpayers of Mountain Home, asking "when does it stop?"

In response, Hiddleston emphasized that a majority of people in the audience and across Mountain Home don't agree with this perspective.

"They have said that they want a YMCA," Hiddleston added.

Stahl also accused the Treasure Valley YMCA of concealing facts about its Caldwell facility, implying that the success stories it highlighted in past briefings were exaggerated.

Everett defended his organization, adding that feedback from Caldwell residents indicate that their local YMCA was the best thing that ever happened to their community.

Comments
View 7 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Sounds like the ladies of the WECRD are out of the picture.

    Do the residents of Caldwell pay taxes for the YMCA? I can not find any referance to it in their property tax breakdown. I did find that it costs a visitor $14.50 to use their pool each visit.

    I would think the Y would be great for our community if I didn't have to pay for something I will never use.

    -- Posted by jtrotter on Wed, Mar 2, 2011, at 8:31 AM
  • Well isn't this exciting? After ten years of taxes they still have to raise 900,000 dollars to build a gym with no pool so that they can drive the local gyms out of business. They can't build something with the two+ million that they have? I thought we were going to get a pool? Does a pool really cost over two million dollars? Oh plus 900,00 that they think this community has to give? Maybe the leaders of the project need a rec center because THEY didnt have recreation and THEY have smoked too much crack. Now we learn that the pool is in phase three? When is that 2074? Wow we get another gym in town and we get to pay these WECRD taxes forever and someone gets to pull 900,00 thousand out of their butt. What innovation. What creativity. What forethought.

    Thank you heavenly father for blessing us with such greats minds to guide us in our recreational daily bread. Yeah thou I walk through the valley of phased projects I will fear no taxes. Thy Gym and thy, well gym, because there aint no pool, will comfort me. Forgive us our debts, because we're going to be charged to use this facility, as we forgive those that tax us. Lead us not into temptation, like the idolaters and wasters of money that run this project. For thine is the aquatics center, the power greedy, and the shameless, for ever and ever amen.

    And phasing this project in is an absolute brilliant idea. The genius. The cunning. The brightest minds in Mountain Home must be involved in this project. You know like the ones that have brought us the phased in high school that we still don't enjoy everyday. Oh yes that is right some of the same minds ARE in on this project. Beautiful.

    -- Posted by CountryDweller on Wed, Mar 2, 2011, at 1:28 PM
  • I attended this meeting. It does seem as though the WECRD is almost out of the picture and the YMCA has taken grasp of things. I disagree with building this facility with the implications being that it WILL ruin some buisnesses. I asked the question regarding the YMCA stating that they want to "Enter into a developing partnership with the local buisness's" I asked how it is they will enter into a partnership and not just ruin someones livelyhood. I got the "YMCA is the greatest thing ever and it has had such a profound affect on the nampa/caldwell community". Huh??? Translation---"We cant answer the question because we all know that some of the local gyms, ie, Fitness First, Fitness Plus, Anytime Fitness, Curves, Etc will see a drastic reduction in customer numbers thus ruining more local buisnesses. Sad but true.

    It is really disappointing to see only about 2 or 3 dozen people show up to a meeting that has so much importance. Where is everyone on this???? Do people not know about the meetings??? Do they not care?? Where was the Mayor, county commisioner, and other public officials??? Where are the buisness owners??? To many unanswered questions. We need a strong showing in this community if we want this process changed!!! I really hope that the people that post on this site are at the meetings as well! If not, Tisk Tisk.........

    -- Posted by bloodyknuckles on Fri, Mar 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM
  • Bloody...if you only knew the 1/2 of it on this. Everyone gets taxed so that we can pay the YMCA 20% of the operational budget (no number available yet) to run it so that 17% of our community will have a place to go for "family" time. I wonder what they did for the thousands of years before recreation centers.

    Contact the 2 people who ran against the current WECRD Board. They can provide you with some details that will make your head spin. Yes, where are all of the people? Why are we not paying attention to what these yahoos are doing with our money? Where is the outrage?

    At home, on the couch with a beer is my guess. Bloody, I am glad you could attend the meeting. You had good questions and they had no real answers as always. Welcome to the wonderful world of the WECRD where they can do as they want because nobody in our Government will take them to task. Must be nice to do whatever you want and worry about if it is legal or not later. Sad state of affairs with this bunch.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Fri, Mar 4, 2011, at 1:05 PM
  • Yes..I do know the half of it. I have been following this for quite some time. The real head spinner was the 77k a month it would cost to maintain the center after just stage 1 was complete. By the time stage 3 would be complete (2024..geez) the YMCA predicts it will run over 200k a month to maintain the facility!!!! Really??? How is it that this community is letting this happen? I voted against the current WECRD board and have attended the meetings! Cmon people, get involved!

    -- Posted by bloodyknuckles on Fri, Mar 4, 2011, at 3:26 PM
  • It is a waste of time to attend the meeting anymore. There is nothing we can do and they (the board) pay no heed to constructive input. The voters of the district have spoken and we have to live with it.

    -- Posted by jtrotter on Fri, Mar 4, 2011, at 3:59 PM
  • Oh no, the "ladies" of the WECRD are in the picture---all 3 of them (and their photo they spent $750.00 on is proof positive). They will get this done one way or the other and will be at ALL future meetings.

    -- Posted by OpinionMissy on Sat, Mar 5, 2011, at 12:39 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: