Larry Rose seeks another term, says still work to be done

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Larry Rose will seek another term as the District 2 Elmore County Commissioner. Rose has been served on the commission since 1997, but believes there still is a lot of work to be done, and he wants to be there to help the county address current and future issues.

"First of all, I would like to thank the people of Elmore County for allowing me the privilege of serving them as their county commissioner," Rose said.

Rose has been a commissioner for nearly 12 years, during which time he has worked with nine different commissioners. "My experience there has been very useful for continuity in the county. When I first became a commissioner, in 1997, the county budget was around $4 million. With inflation, growth and increase in required services, it is now over $14 million.

Addressing growth, and in particular its impact on the county's aquifer, is a priority with Rose. He notes that the county commissioners have tried for several years to bring the county's water woes to the attention of the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR).

Thousands of dollars has been spent on a groundwater study for the Mountain Home area, but state officials have yet to make any comments or offer any guidelines on how best to address the ongoing draw down of the aquifer. An omission that befuddles Rose, and does little to assist with a problem that could force county commissioners to take desperate measures to protect critical groundwater supplies.

As a commissioner, Rose said he would continue bringing the matter before the IDWR in hopes the agency will eventually recognize and address the groundwater crisis. Although Rose believes IDWR should take the lead on managing the state's water sources, he also thinks commissioners must be given the flexibility to make decisions on how to best manage the county's aquifer and surface water supplies.

Believing that resolutions to the county's growth issues must be addressed by all impacted agencies, Rose is eager to continue monthly brain-storming sessions.

For the past five years, members of the county commission have sat on a committee, consisting of mayors and council members from both Glenns Ferry and Mountain Home, as well as representatives from city and county fire departments, highway districts, emergency services, the sheriff's department and various other local agencies impacted by the county's rapid growth, particularly in the Mountain Home area.

Rose believes these meeting have been beneficial for all parties and are essential when it comes to making budget decisions.

Budget constraints continue to challenge the county commissioners. Rose noted that the county's contribution to the Meals-on-Wheels, and local senior citizens nutrition programs, has increased due to reduced funding at the state level.

Each year, the county pays Central District Health Department $109,000 to perform septic system installation inspections, conduct immunization clinics, pay for a mosquito abatement program, as well as defray some of the costs for operating the Meals-on-Wheels and senior nutrition programs.

Due a reduction in state funding, the commissioners approved an additional $5,200 for the Meals-on-Wheels, and senior nutrition programs for the 2008-09 budget year. Rose believes these programs are important and that the county commissioners must rise to the challenge of making sure these programs remain viable.

Another area of concern for Rose is the increase costs associated with the county's judicial system. With the rise in criminal activity comes the need to address funding for probation officers, victim mediation programs, and parenting programs. Rose says much of the money for these programs come from grants, but notes, those funds dry up after a few years and the county must find a way to take up the slack.

As a commissioner, Rose believes the best way to address the county's budgetary needs is to address spending priorities, and he foresees that growth will bring in additional tax revenue to help with these programs.

"I believe that the budget--ensuring that expenses do not exceed revenue--is the primary duty of a county commissioner. Each year is more of a challenge in making this happen, but with the excellent working relationship I have with the other elected officials, and employees of the county, we have been, and will be able to continue to, achieve these goals."

Rose believes that, political affiliations aside, the lines of communication between an elected official and the public is paramount to seeing that the county continues to move in a positive direction towards the future.

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Ahhhh Mr. Rose. If you are so concerned about our water then why is it that time after time you approve the subdivisions and the dairies, etc.? You talk a good game but your record goes against all that you are "concerned" about. I guess you did not know that anybody who went to a hearing would read how "concerned" you are. Please!!!

    Further, if the criminals paid their full fines and the fines were not reduced by 1/2 or more, Elmore County would not have to worry about the money for programs dealing with the Court. If the PA of Elmore County would stop allowing the repeat offenders to get away with things time after time---WE would have the money for the programs and would not have to rely as much on grants. Plus, maybe the criminals would commit less crimes in our county if they got in trouble for it and HAD TO PAY! The answers are right under your nose. Get with it Mr. Rose.

    Concerned? Huh. When and where? You vote the way of the good old boys just about every time. Your concern, it would seem, is for them and yourself. You did say that your are pro nuclear power as well. How does all of this pollution help us Mr Rose? Please, by all means, enlighten me. Time for new eyes and ears. No vote from me!

    -- Posted by Elmorehorselady on Wed, May 14, 2008, at 7:29 PM
  • Sorry Mr Rose, I"ll Vote for somebody else, you read more like the Liberial Tax and spend guy.

    Rose believes that, political affiliations aside, the lines of communication between an elected official and the public is paramount to seeing that the county continues to move in a positive direction towards the future.

    there's a disconnect here, No Mr Rose we are not moving in a positive direction and you've been there 12 years,,?? time for a change

    -- Posted by Freedom on Thu, May 15, 2008, at 8:28 AM
  • Larry Rose, are you KIDDING ME???????? You are a joke! There wouldn't be a much work to be "done" had you stayed on track.

    I agree with the other comments, it is time for someone ELSE to come in. Time for CHANGE for our beautiful county. WE need fresh ideas here.

    NO VOTE FROM ME, GET OUT AND NOT MAKE A FOOL OF YOURSELF!!!!!!!!

    -- Posted by elkspringer on Sat, May 17, 2008, at 9:51 AM
  • We need to vote them ALL out and vote NEW in. Maybe then - the commissioners and other voted seats will realize that the citizens have had it up to our elbows with the good ole boy/girl syndrome.

    -- Posted by midea on Sun, May 18, 2008, at 11:43 PM
  • Now tell me horselady, have I missed something. Are the Commissioners now in charge of catching criminals, fining them, sentencing them, and keeping them in jail.

    If so they are way busier than I thought.

    I feel that the Commissioners have a lot to deal with and do a good job.

    It never happens that "everyone" is happy with any decision, no matter what it is.

    -- Posted by yniashi on Mon, May 19, 2008, at 5:04 PM
  • yniashi:

    I must have read a different article than you did---other than the one above. Mr. Rose clearly states that he has concerns with the funding of Court programs. That is why I made the comment that I did. Perhaps you could read the article again. He does not work all that hard and got a raise in the last year or 2---more than most of us got.

    Read the police blotter. That says it all. Arrest after arrest (same people with 3-6 or more charges) and some charges are dropped and most fines/Court costs are greatly reduced. Why? So that they taxpayer(s)can pick up the slack for the dirt ball criminals. Many of whom make the paper several times a month for MULTIPLE charges. Give me a break on how busy these 3 people are. They make decisions based on who is the highest bidder. There is very little thought process in much of it. Just look at the bind we are in with the growth and our schools. Enough said. They all need to go in hopes that people with some common sense will be/can be elected.

    -- Posted by Elmorehorselady on Tue, May 20, 2008, at 6:09 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: