Time to set aside politics
Kelly Everitt

Crushing the commentary

Posted Wednesday, September 14, 2011, at 8:45 AM
Comments
View 9 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Good for you Kelly, I agree wholeheartedly.

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Wed, Sep 14, 2011, at 11:52 AM
  • Sixth paragraph (not a typo)

    waiver:

    A formal written statement of relinquishment

    waver:

    Hesitate, pause or hold back in uncertainty or unwillingness

    Second use is appropriate here.

    -- Posted by Idaho Al on Wed, Sep 14, 2011, at 11:57 AM
  • Good catch Al.

    -- Posted by royincaldwell on Wed, Sep 14, 2011, at 12:31 PM
  • cantjustwatch, I have to agree with you and echo what you said. At times, I laugh at how things are reported, take the last paragraph of the story about Anne's drowning. Really? A Vodka bottle was found at the scene and no one claimed it? I wonder who does the proof reading of these stories. Why is it necessary to print charges after her death? They mean nothing, it means nothing. She's dead!

    -- Posted by ItsJustMeAgain on Wed, Sep 14, 2011, at 1:53 PM
  • *

    "Sometimes we block comments because we have reason to anticipate that most of the comments will be mean-spirited,"

    I like this censorship of the 1st amendment from the newspaper. Don't get me wrong I understand why you don't allow comments on some stories but do I agree with it, probably not.

    It has been a liberal's drum to beat that the 1st amendment should NEVER be infringed. Now it seems it should only be infringed if they anticipate opinions or views other than their own. Instead of removing people's right to speak their minds all together why not just censor the ones that are obscene.

    I don't always agree with can't justwatch but I do feel she was just asking a question that I have wanted to ask but never did. She wasn't mean or complaining about it; she just asked a question.

    I guess this is how the liberal press does it, squash any opinions that are not in support of your own.

    And America takes another step back.......

    -- Posted by Trouble2011 on Wed, Sep 14, 2011, at 3:15 PM
  • Why is it when a person dies, it is reported after their death that a court proceeding was dismissed?

    Those that knew the person know they can't pay the fine or fines and those that didn't know the person do they really care?

    Please have a little dignity for the dead!

    -- Posted by MsMarylin on Wed, Sep 14, 2011, at 3:41 PM
  • *

    I really can't see when the question was asked about some events no comment could be made was complaining but guess that is the way it was taken. A simple answer to why would have been all it took instead of a blog full of more complaining.

    How about the article that is still on here about the Base Dedicates Refurbishes Service Center, must have been a real crime there to not being able to post a comment as if anyone wanted to anyway.

    -- Posted by Eagle_eye on Wed, Sep 14, 2011, at 4:47 PM
  • "Anonymous bloggers on our website" Anonymous to who?

    -- Posted by skeeter on Thu, Sep 15, 2011, at 5:45 AM
  • I wonder what it would take for you (Kelly) to just put the keyboard away and take a hike????

    -- Posted by bloodyknuckles on Thu, Sep 15, 2011, at 1:41 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: