SICK OF THE BLEEDING HEART LIBERALS!!!!!!Posted Monday, December 20, 2010, at 8:42 AM
Once again, the livelihood of numerous people has been destroyed by bleeding heart animal loving idiots who value animals more than the lives of humans. (Go ahead & blast me with hate-mail)I see extreme problems with families not able to afford the basics of life. I see a government in shambles. I see homes foreclosed, homeless families rising, unemployment and I could go on & on. WHY would a bird's life have priority over humans? The normal course of action in the CONSERVATION OF THE SPECIES game seems go something like this; a conservation group will find a species of animal in danger; they will scream and cry to media and local organizations about the horror; gain support by signatures or what-have-you (because anyone who doesn't show support for a cute animal's existence is not a true PC soldier-GASP!) and finally the activist leaders will go before a judge to have an area set aside for these animals to breed and humans are banned. Wow, the all=powerful humans have saved another species from extinction. Shutting down beaches so that the piping plover birds can breed undisturbed is another example of this game. The birds will have their babies while all the humans who worked for years and years to grow a business to support generations of family are sacrificed! It doesn't touch these bleeding hearts that the human's children are suffering because Daddy and Mommy's business is closed down and their homes are foreclosed. No! Of course not! In the Animal Conservation Game, humans have no value. Don't get me wrong...I love, love animals very much! But please! How is this right? How do we protect a bird and turn our backs on people? Example: These voices that cry for the piping plover bird shut down beaches in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. I know that there are many of situations where we need to step in and help a species. Yes, there are plenty of times that we need to make laws to protect animals. I am not heartless! However, how do you justify hurting people for a bird that in the grand scheme of things doesn't do diddlee squat for us??? "When the People of Hatteras Island had their land taken from them to form the National Seashore they were promised that they would always have access to the beaches in the same manner as they always have had access. Even in the earliest days people drove to the beach, first with pack animals and later with cars and trucks. Now, that promise is being ignored and access to those same beaches is slowly being taken away to save the Piping Plover. " Consider this, the decline of the species could actually be something else. " Migrating birds of all species stop off in the Delaware Bay in the spring of every year to fatten up before the breeding season. They like the Delaware Bay because at the same time the birds stop off the Horse Shoe Crabs come ashore and lay billions of eggs in the shallows. This supply of food is diminishing as Horse Shoe crabs are being over fished to use as bait to catch Whelks. Without this abundant food source there is nothing that will save the birds." (Greg Cremia-EzineArticles.com) How about this comment from the Board of Commissioners, Vice-Chairman, Allen Burrus reflected, "Our people, who were the first to care about the environment, are now being ruined because of the consent decree." He added, "We need to take proper care of the birds, but we also have to do what is right for people. Children should not see their parents go bankrupt because of some birds that are not even classified as endangered." Wow! What really is amazing is that anyone caught violating the beach with their barefeet and hope of having a wonderful day at the beach could face a fine up to $5,000 or 6 months in jail. Thank goodness we have laws to protect us all from beach-loving families! I don't know how the animal kingdom survived all this time without the Activist groups. How did the animals manage for centuries? Human intervention was not there for them. Perhaps the natural order of nature took care of things the way it was supposed to be without our help. Oh my! Could that be? Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
I've lived in Mtn Home for over 20 years. I love my city and my country. Since I am a writer, my decision to blog here seemed appropriate. I enjoy acting so I've been blessed with the opportunity to work on some independent films and with Prairie Dog Productions and Bogus Creek Ranch. I hope that something I have to write about has some value for others or just amuses someone.
Hot topics Mayfield? Here's my thought.(5 ~ 10:39 AM, Aug 18)
Watch myi48 short film
FINALLY USAMA BIN LADEN DEAD
i48 Film Festival
Pakistan, the Lying Nation
|
Email link
Read comments (11)
Blog archive
![[Feed icon]](http://www.mountainhomenews.com/images/icons/feed-icon-14x14.png){kind=icon}
Thank you for your post, and I'd like to add:
First, regarding the Piping Plover. Realize we're only talking about an increase this year of 4-8 fledged chicks. That's right. The increase in population this year was roughly that on Cape Hatteras. That figure is less then 1 percent of 1 percent of the total Plover population. So we're trashing the economy of Cape Hatteras over that figure. Secondly, the closures at Hatteras if anything create the opposite reaction on those beaches, because it allows fauna to encroach, which allows predators. But the NPS has a handle on that situation - they simply trap and kill any animal that wanders into the dunes. This is documented. Finally, according the US Army Corp of Engineers, the wave heights along that section of the east coast have been very calm the past few years -- no hurricanes...optimum conditions for nesting. Even the NPS has written that less than 3% of chick mortality is related to humans. So, the cost for 4-8 birds equals thousands of dead mammals, one economy, 50+ bankrupt businesses, 400+ foreclosures since the closures began, hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to litigate and enforce the enclosures...on and on. As they say, only in America.
Which brings us to the reality of this story -- this isn't about birds or turtles. It's about money. Period. The Southern Environmental Law Center rakes in hundreds of thousands of dollars for filing their suits. And guess who pays? We do -- the taxpayers, under the Endangered Species Act, among others. They are environmental ambulance chasers, or worse. Then, Audubon and the Defenders of Wildlife -- They are very big machines now that have completely forgotten the doctrine that enabled their existence in the first place. And big machines are hungry and must be fed (dollars). So, they thrive on controversy. Every time a bird or a turtle or whatever makes their newsletter or magazine as a victim of progress or people or the man-in-the-moon, some poor, misinformed person writes them a check, because they think it's the right thing to do. So Audubon keeps those forlorn photos coming, and the checks keep coming. It's just a racket...and well intended people are caught up in it.
The upside, rational people and the media, as we saw today have figured it out. And a backlash is coming. And I for one will make sure both sides of this story is well told.
Thank you again for your post.
Wow Jeff! thanks so much for that great information. I hope that alot of people will read this, Where did you come from to find me>
Considering the north east portion of the United States is pretty much a haven for the bleeding heart libs in this country it is almost poetic, KARMA even. It would be interesting to see just how many of those financially devistated by this WERE liberal bleeding hearts before getting the shaft themselves.
Even more ironic and poetic if some of those were contributors to the "Southern Environmental Law Center" and "Audubon and the Defenders of Wildlife".
All too often that seems to be the case in this country. Liberal pukes are willing to throw anyone else "under the bus" that is UNTIL THEY ARE AFFECTED, then come the tears and "awww poor me"
Well My answer is pretty simple YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW!
Well CJW...........you remember what a liberal IS, don't ya?...................
"A CONSERVATIVE who hasn't been mugged yet!"
Zook,
You got that right Sir! and thankfully as more and more of them get "mugged" by their own foolish decisions(stupidity) that political pendulum will swing back to "common sense" which just doesn't seem so common lately.......
What did you think of the don't ask don't tell repeal mess recently? I am so thankful that I am retired already that words cant describe it.
It still just AMAZES me that these liberal pukes who mostly have never served a day in uniform have decided what is best for the military on this.
I intend to let every active duty military person I know that it is now their right to move into the berthing/barracks/dorm room of their choosing so they may cohabitate with whichever member of whichever sex they choose to watch dress/undress and bathe on a daily basis.
Hi Kim,
Someone forwarded me a link, that's how! Let's stay in touch. I"m on Facebook at The Greystone Project.
CJW.............I don't think you wanna KNOW what I think about "don't ask don't tell." Like you, I'm glad I'm retired.
But I'm proud to say that even in "politically correct 2010", at least ONE branch commander STOOD UP in opposition to it.............The Commandant of the Marine Corps!
I wouldn't want to be one of those "light-in-the-loafers" little twinkletoes trying to make it through Parris Island, or Pendleton, though. Unless things have changed DRASTICALLY since I was in, the Corps still takes care of problems "in-house"---------"don't know WHERE he went"-----------"didn't see nothin'"--------------"He must have gone AWOL." And accidents HAVE been known to happen back there in that swamp.
I saw a guy get thrown down two flights of stairs once.
And there AREN'T any stairs in a quonset hut!
Do I detect a couple Prejudice people posting on this blog ?
Prejudice is a baseless and usually negative attitude toward members of a group
MsMarylin,
Did you not read what I posted? what was "prejudiced" about that? My believing in EQUAL rights? Sounds to me like you may be a bit bigoted and biased lady. Please take a moment to RE-READ my statement regarding the potential new living arrangements.
Am I incorrect in assuming that a heterosexual young male would prefer to watch women dress/undress and bathe rather than another man?
Did the laws of nature suddenly flip and I missed it?
If you are a gay female who would you rather watch undress? G.I Joe or Angelina Jolie? seems pretty simple to me, nothing "prejudiced" about that at all, just plain old EQUAL maybe you should look it up in the dictionary or if you need help let me know I will find it online and cut and paste it here for you to read.
I understand, as a woman, that I could never fully understand how a heterosexual retired soldier would feel towards a gay soldier. However, BaZooka, I would never support any violence against another soldier. This blog wasn't written about that anyways! On subject, please. I want the word out about this one example of many. Perhaps it doesn't mean a hill-of-beans to some but the implications of what is being done to these people in the name of a freaking stupid bird is alarming! This is a big example of the route that our country is taking. 2012 may not be the end of the world as some people think, but I certainly believe that the Mayans knew that something big was going to upset the balance of the world. Signs are everywhere! Show these people in Cape Hatteras that they are not alone! Go tp the Jeff's website, The Graystone Project and tell them. Pass it on to others. Thanks so much.
MsMarilyn...........I never said I SUPPORTED it...........but in an outfit as tight as OURS is/was......lives depend on each other, and when it is felt that somebody isn't "one of us".......well, things HAVE happened.
I cannot speak accurately for the 2010 Marine Corps, but in MY day, we were NEVER "PC". An outfit as small as ours HAD to be focused to survive and win. NOTHING was "Gospel" unless it came down from the "Gunny."
I personally find it REPULSIVE, that the yellow slimebags who have never served, can decide "what's best for our military." NOBODY ever asked the TROOPS how THEY felt........
But, what the heck..........trillion-dollar un-read bills have been passed under the same scenario..........doesn't matter what the people want.
And shades of Jimmy Carter's SALT II..........."WE and the Russians will BOTH cut back our weaponry........" RIGHT!!
I guess we can trust PUTIN better than we could Brehznev, eh?
AGAIN...............we've learned nothing, and are being sold out once more.
Every "Republican" who caved in to this should be impeached and thrown into "Tent City" with Sheriff Joe.