Points 7-14 Nationalized HealthcarePosted Monday, May 18, 2009, at 8:31 AM
8. Healthy people who take care of themselves will have to pay for the burden of those who smoke, are obese, etc. 9. A long, painful transition will have to take place involving lost insurance industry jobs, business closures, and new patient record creation. 10. Loss of private practice options and possible reduced pay may dissuade many would-be doctors from pursuing the profession. 11. Malpractice lawsuit costs, which are already sky-high, could further explode since universal care may expose the government to legal liability, and the possibility to sue someone with deep pockets usually invites more lawsuits. 12. Government is more likely to pass additional restrictions or increase taxes on smoking, fast food, etc., leading to a further loss of personal freedoms. Politicians will pass more "sin" taxes on things like alcohol, high-fat food, smoking, etc. They could ban trans fat, limit msg, eliminate high-fructose corn syrup. But pretty soon, people will no longer be able to choose to enjoy their favorite foods, even in moderation. One more excuse to gain more control of the people but in the guise of "for your own good" 13. Patient confidentiality is likely to be compromised since centralized health information will likely be maintained by the government. All past medical history can be used by faceless people to make critical decisions about what healthcare you deserve. 14. Like social security, any government benefit eventually is taken as a "right" by the public, meaning that it's politically near impossible to remove or curtail it later on when costs get out of control. Social Security was supposed to be put in place to help those older retired people through their last few years however the life span was considerable lower. Now people live well into their 90's. Hmmmm, wonder if it is the great health care? So now it is headed for bankruptcy and nobody can fix it. When Bush tried to re-structure it, the Democrats went all Freddy Krugar and did a scare campaign about Bush's intention to "take away your social security". As costs rise, there is no politician who can touch it without causing certain death to their career. It is smeared with deficiencies and inefficiency and an aging population. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
I've lived in Mtn Home for over 20 years. I love my city and my country. Since I am a writer, my decision to blog here seemed appropriate. I enjoy acting so I've been blessed with the opportunity to work on some independent films and with Prairie Dog Productions and Bogus Creek Ranch. I hope that something I have to write about has some value for others or just amuses someone.
Hot topics Mayfield? Here's my thought.(5 ~ 10:39 AM, Aug 18)
Watch myi48 short film
FINALLY USAMA BIN LADEN DEAD
i48 Film Festival
Pakistan, the Lying Nation
|
BTW It was 7:30 am when I posted that blog! ;)
Point #14 is the primary reason that i would vote against any nationalizing of health care. I come from a family of smokers and thoroughly unhealthy individuals. They would be the type that make the system not work.
I'm with you on that Twil. Not a good idea to say the least. Number 8 is another reason. There's no incentive for people to try to get themselves well by taking "care" of themselves. And then - take a guess who pays for it.
Now the other part about grandma and grandpa. I don't like that either. My mother-in-law had heart surgery at 82 and she is still going strong today. I would have hated to hear a Dr. tell her that she was too old so therefore just go home and "die". It's sad - but that does happen under gov't run care in other countries.