Taylor Swift vs the king of popPosted Tuesday, October 13, 2009, at 7:59 PM
In a typically year, Taylor, nominated for a total of six awards, would be a lock for the award in the category that includes Lady Gaga, Eminem and Kings of Leon for no other reason than fans get an online vote and Taylor has made her career in part due to the large online presences of her fans. There's no doubt many of those fans will flock to the AMA's Web site to vote for Taylor, but she faces an uphill battle against the man who almost bought down the Internet when he died unexpectedly over the summer. Jackson's nomination for the award, and four others, is ridiculous. It's highly doubtful all of his nominations came as a result of "This is it," a single released Monday. Instead, his nominations come as a direct result of his death. How lame is it the American Music Awards is willing to honor an artist who didn't release any music this year until yesterday with its biggest award? The artist of the year, and every other award for that matter, shouldn't go to an artist whose only contribution to society this year was the massive amounts of media coverage his death received. Music awards should be about music. Not about honoring legacies or lifetime achievements. If the AMA's want to acknowledge Michael Jackson's lasting contributions to the music world, they should do so with a special award presented to his family and be done with it. Allowing him, and his memory, to compete directly with artists who actually produced music this year is ridiculous and is unfair to artist who would have been nominated in his place, presumably Beyonce in the best artist category. The awards air November 22. Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Robert's Randoms ![]() - Archives - Blog RSS feed - Comments RSS feed - Send email to Robert J. Taylor - Login @robertsrandoms robert.taylor34@gmail.com The idea behind Robert's Random is for me to write about whatever I'm thinking about whenever I'm thinking it. I try to write 3-5 times a week, but sometimes real work gets in the way of that. Sometimes I'll share whatever random thought I might have that day but most of the time, I like to write about things going on in the news. I'm a total news junkie, I spend a lot of time online at various news sites. If I find a story where someone does something totally stupid or I wonder "what were they thinking?" I don't mind pointing it out incase others missed it or taking my best guess at what they were thinking. I like to laugh, I like to make others laugh. There's so much serious and wrong stuff going on in the news that when I find an unusual or light story, I like to use it. And while real life news events might be the focus of many of my blogs, I'm just trying to entertain you, make you laugh and maybe even think about something you didn't know before reading. I'm not trying to break any serious news or deliver any hard-hitting coverage. You'll have to read a paper or watch one of the network shows for that. Hot topics Follow me though law school(0 ~ 3:44 PM, Jan 18)
WAC fires intern for costly mistake, BSU loss
An open letter to Boise State president Bob Kustra
I turn 27... and write about it
My niece teaches me a lesson
|
Just like the Nobel Peace Award going to the President based on what he might do in the future huh? Many awards are not based on what one does but what one claims to have done or claims they will do in the future.
I agree with you that Mr. Jackson is not deserving of the AMA Artist of the Year. They are far more people that are more deserving on what they did during the year not what they might have done during the year.