Overcast ~ 43°F  
Login | Register
Thursday, February 9, 2012

The Traitors.......part II.......under the door

Posted Wednesday, January 7, 2009, at 2:58 AM

This is the portion the leftwing media DOESN'T cover. It's imperative for these politicians to surprise everyone AFTER it's a "done deal."

So where should we start?.............h-mmmmmm..........get your notebook out, "Pennsylvania Mike"....here we go...

H.R. 1022......Introduced by Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY), 67 co-sponsors, ALL Democrats, featuring such notables as:

Sheila Jackson Lee

Dennis Kucinich

Neil Abercrombie

Barney Frank

RAHM EMANUEL

Patrick Kennedy

.................1022 would ban ANY weapon THEY consider to be "assault weapons" including select semi-automatic shotguns, ANY semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine (which takes in a NUMBER of 22's), pistols with more than a 10-round magazine capacity, any shotgun that holds more than 5 rounds or has a folding stock, any long gun with a barrel shroud.

(The Attorney General, (who is obviously some sort of "expert"), gets to decide what guns have no sporting use).

No private sales. If you want to sell a gun, even to your BROTHER...it has to go through a dealer--------record keeping

POSTNOTE---California's Dianne Feinstein thinks we're ALL as stupid as the people who vote for her out there. Trying to smooth us over, she said a few years ago, that she wasn't trying to be unreasonable, she just wanted bans on handguns that held more than 5 rounds of ammo! So much for the revolvers, eh?....and 95% of the rest.

H.R. 2666........introduced by Bobby Rush (D-IL), and co-sponsored by:

Dennis Kucinich

RAHM EMANUEL

Jesse Jackson

Charles Rangel

..........2666 would require licensing of ALL gun owners---------(again, record keeping)

H.R. 5266......introduced by Xavier Becerra (D-CA-31), and co-sponsored by:

CAROLYN McCarthy (D-NY)

John Conyers (D-MI)

Charles Rangel (D-NY)

Jesse Jackson (D-IL)

RAHM EMANUEL (D-IL)

Pat Kennedy (D-RI)

.....5266...(are you ready for THIS?) would require MICROSTAMPING on semi automatic pistols. It requires a microscopic array of characters that identify make, model and serial number etched onto the face of the breech and on the FIRING PIN to be transferred onto the cartridge case upon firing, so if that case was recovered, they'd be able to track it to the gun's original owner............on the FIRING PIN........they KNOW that couldn't be done. Even if it COULD, the cost of manufacture would put these "new pistols" out of pocket reach for most people, (and isn't that the idea?)..............also, with normal wear, tear and carbon buildup the markings wouldn't remain legible.

The OTHER part of this bill, would be that ALL handguns that DON'T have this feature would be banned, which means EVERY one now in existence!

There is a Senate Bill (2605) version of this same "microstamping thing co-sponsored by Democrats, Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Richard Durbin and Frank Lautenberg.

S. 1331....introduced by Diane Feinstein (D-CA), and co-sponsored by:

Ted Kennedy (D-MA)

Barbara Boxer (D-CA)

Richard Durbin (D-IL)

Carl Levin (D-MI)

Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

Chris Dodd (D-CT)

HILLARY CLINTON (D-NY)

Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)

.....1331 would ban 50 caliber rifles...........what for? Ever seen a 50? They're as big as a two-by-four, weigh about 35 pounds, and NOBODY is going to stick one down in his pants and try to commit a ROBBERY with one.

Originally installed in P-51 Mustangs and such, the 50 caliber BMG cartridge was designed to shoot down enemy aircraft..............which also means it would be capable of taking down a helicopter............but why would the Feds fear THAT? Do they plan to USE copters against the citizens sometime in the future? (See "Ruby Ridge, Idaho" and "Operation Garden Plot).

S.A. 1615....July, 2005).Ted Kennedy's proposed amendment....a ban on 223 caliber ammunition, 30-30, and 7.62 caliber ammo. Sounds pretty limited and maybe even "reasonable, eh?..........until you consider that the 7.62 also covers ALL 30 caliber ammo, from the 30 carbine, to the 30-30 lever action, the ever popular 30.06, 300 Savage, 300 Winchester and so on. Kennedy and his cronies refer to ANY rifle cartridge capable of taking large game, as being able to penetrate bullet-proof vests............(this will take in the 270, 7mm, etc).

AH..........."COP-KILLER bullets"..................Hey man, if you have a hard time trying to take the GUNS, let's just ban the AMMO!...................Barack Obama supports this as well.

Speaking of the "second coming", let's take a quick peek at HIS thoughts

OBAMA..talkin' 'bout YOUR boy, Mike..............

Yeah, he's "Not going to take our guns"...I heard him say that too.........when he was needing votes. But let's see how HE'S voted......ready?

He introduced legislation to ban the use of firearms for home defense, and prosecute anyone who DOES (IL S.B. 2165, March 25, 2004).

He opposed concealed carry, Chicago Tribune interview, April 27, 2004

If elected President, he would push for NO gunshops within 5 miles of a school (how big is YOUR town?)---interview with Wall Syreet Journal, April 17, 2008...page A-19. (Is THAT EXACT ENOUGH for you, "Ex"?

S.B. 1195, he wants confiscation of ANY long gun 50 caliber or larger, which would also include the old black powder percussion guns as well.and if taken to a technicality, would ban every shotgun from 410 to 12 gauge or larger.

S. 397...Obama supported the bill to allow lawsuits against firearms manufacturers if one of their firearms is used in a crime. Joe Biden supports this as well..............(when you can't bust the Constitution, you try to bankrupt the gunmakers through the courts).

He wanted a total handgun ban in Illinois, and indicated it on a questionairre from the Illinois Precinct Organization, question number 35.

He told the VPC (Violence Policy Center) during a fund-raiser, QUOTE:....."My first priority will be to reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban as soon as I take office. Within 90 days, we will go back after "kitchen table dealers" and work to end the gunshows and internet loopholes. In the first year, I intend to work with Congress on a NATIONAL no-carry law."

...................folks, I've been going to gunshows for a lot of years. I've found everything from rear sights for an 1886 Winchester, to grease containers for my old M-1 Garand...............but I've never found a "loophole" When you buy a gun, it's CALLED in and OK'd before you ever leave the fairgrounds...paperwork and all...no exceptions.

You CANNOT buy a gun on the internet, unless you have an FFL (Federal Firearms License). If you don't..it has to be shipped to your local dealer, where you STILL have to go do the paperwork.

Personally, I'd LOVE to know where these "loopholes" are!

Obama's record on our gun rights stinks! When you take the oath of office, you swear to protect and defend our Constitution............ALL of it....not just the parts you agree with. That's why I said in an earlier blog, that he will commit perjury while his hand is still on the Bible (we HOPE it's the Bible).

Finally, before I close "part II"...........if I know Ex-Intern, he'll be itching to tell us all that he's looked up all of these bills and they mean NOTHING because they never got passed.

And he'll be right.........they DIDN'T pass. Most were introduced in 2007, when the Dems DIDN'T have the votes to get it done.

But it's prudent to remember three things:

1. When Obama takes office, they WILL have the votes, with the seats they picked up in the progress.

2. The same clowns who engineered these bills are STILL in there, any "tie-breakers would be in the hands of anti-gun Biden, and there will be NO chance of a Presidential veto by Obama. After decades of dimentia, there is no reason to believe their anti-gun priorities have changed.

3. Time..........not knowing how the seats will restack in 2010, the Dems only have these next two years to strike while the iron is still hot. It will be the best opportunity to once again try to disarm this country, they may ever have. They almost HAVE to make their move within the next 24 months, before the "window of opportunity" is potentially gone.

Part III in the next day or so.........


Comments
Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

Time will tell.

I'll be blunt, I'd be still more comfortable if the rural Democrats, NRA, and other groups wrested House judiciary from Conyers, or at least installed one of their own at chair of the constitutional law subcommittee. But I still think the leadership will either bottle up gun control or allow the opposition to gut it on the floor. They know why they lost in '94.

Carolyn McCarthy, by the way, is pretty much the anti-gun lobby's official congresswoman, and has been ever since she entered congress after her husband and son were gunned down on a commuter train. But I'm sure for her it's all about taking away the guns of rural Americans so they'll be defenseless against the coming dictatorship. Just like I'm sure impugning opponents' motives is the most constructive way of getting them to accept their approach to policy is wrong.

Oh, and then there's Dennis Kucinich. What's his success rate for getting ANY legislation passed? How's Bush's impeachment coming? I've long suspected the way Democrats kill one of their own initiatives is by letting their vegan, ex-homeless congressman get involved.

-- Posted by ExInternMike on Wed, Jan 7, 2009, at 4:52 AM

Mike:

Provide the proof/facts and it is still not good enough. Just because someone is not "good" at getting legislation passed does NOT mean it cannot happen. Follow the money. They are all crooks up there. Pretty sad that we allow it and it is thought of as okay. Tax payer money used to bail out industry with years and years of record profits and pay increases. It is criminal they got away with it and are not in jail and it is CRIMINAL that we, the people, ALLOW it. From my cold, dead, bloody hands...

Nice blog Mike B. No matter what "proof" you provide they still will never get it because there are a million excuses why people do what they do in the name of the "people." What a joke. Take care. Thank gosh this yahoo is not in this town. He would probably be one of the ECC's or something like that. What ever did happen to the guns that the ECC's purchased for themselves for no good reason but to waste money---OUR money? Who has custody of those guns now? Probably sold to a street gang for a loss.

-- Posted by OpinionMissy on Wed, Jan 7, 2009, at 7:53 AM

And for SURE, it'd be for a loss. Like these "gun buy-back" programs they used to try on us.

Fifty bucks a pop...no questions asked............you bet, I'm gonna run right down to city hall and surrender a $600.00 Smith & Wesson for "gas & beer money."

Additionally, you cannot "buy back" something you never owned to BEGIN with!

Hang on Missy...........wait till you see what's coming in the opening salvos of part III. The referenced You Tube video will chill the blood of all who watch it. It is Obama himself in action...watch his lips and hear him speak at one of his rallies last year.

-- Posted by bazookaman on Wed, Jan 7, 2009, at 9:10 AM

They will say it was not him that said it or that it was voice over...

We are about to be SAVED!!! Remember...change we can believe in. More welfare and open borders. This should be fun.

-- Posted by OpinionMissy on Wed, Jan 7, 2009, at 9:00 PM

"Provide the proof/facts and it is still not good enough. Just because someone is not 'good' at getting legislation passed does NOT mean it cannot happen."

Two sentences that wouldn't be hilarious IF they weren't in succession. When something DID happen, it's proof. When something COULD happen, it's conjecture.

-- Posted by ExInternMike on Fri, Jan 9, 2009, at 1:01 AM

That's correct. And what DID happen is Obama's VOTING RECORD, BIDEN's along WITH it, and a host of others.........and I've referenced every one of them.

-- Posted by bazookaman on Fri, Jan 9, 2009, at 7:22 AM


Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


Shots from Bazookaman
Michael Bradbury
Recent posts
Archives
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Login
Hot topics
Job Description?
(12 ~ 9:24 PM, Oct 28)

The Traitors........part one
(14 ~ 4:59 AM, Jan 27)

Ninety-Nine and "Nighty-Night"
(8 ~ 3:48 PM, Jan 15)

An Even Hundred Before I Go
(4 ~ 3:35 PM, Jan 15)

The Traitors.......part III......brown or black?
(15 ~ 7:46 AM, Jan 13)